Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 86 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Zarean shirvaneh deh E, Mousavi Sadati S K, Daneshjoo A. Study of Effect of the Corrective Exercises With and Without Taping on The Balance and Pronated Foot of Female Students 15 To 17 Years Old. MEJDS 2022; 12 :86-86
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2138-en.html
1- Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, East Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University
Abstract:   (1771 Views)

Background & Objectives: The feet require proper weight distribution during many body motions such as those for the maintenance of static balance and gait. In general, an abnormally low medial longitudinal arch in foot is called pes planus or flatfeet, which is divided into rigid and flexible pes planus. Pes planus has been reported to cause abnormal functions of the tendon sheath of the tibialis posterior, including dynamic imbalance, pain, joint damage, and even stress fractures. Diagnosing and improving flatfeet in the early age is effective in preventing various injuries. Foot as the most distal segment in the lower extremity chain, represents relatively small base of support on which the body maintains balance. Although it seems reasonable that even minor biomechanical alternations in the support surface may influence postural-control strategies. Studies represented several ways of using kinesiotape was affected on handling many kinds of skeletal deformities. There was evidence exists that traditional taping can be effective in controlling excessive pronated foot. The aim of this study was to evaluate corrective exercises and the use of kinesiotape on flatfeet and balance index in female students aged 15 to 17 years.
Methods: The method of this research was semi-experimental, which was conducted as an intervention in the form of a pre-test and post-test research design with two experimental groups. The statistical population of female students was 15 to 17 years old in Tehran, 28 female volunteer students were suffered pronation foot grouped random in 2, including 14 in both experimental group, corrective exercises with taping and corrective exercises without taping. The criteria for entering students into the research were: suffering from flat feet; written consent of the volunteer and parents; Confirmation of the health questionnaire by a specialist doctor, including checking the complete health of the skeletal and neuromuscular system, the visual system, the vestibular hearing system; Not taking any drugs that affect the nervous system and control posture; Not having a history of accidents and ankle sprains; Negativeness of the adhesive sensitivity test and no coldness and sweating of the soles of the feet. The criteria for the withdrawal of students from the research, eczema in the long term, the appearance of disorders in the health of the sensory and nervous systems, vestibular hearing, the appearance of vertigo, impaired control of standing, the occurrence of any type of accident and the occurrence of movement problems, the inability to continue exercises and the increase in body mass index body mass index (BMI) during the intervention period. The navicular drop test and foot printed measured by Staheli method were done to diagnose flat foot. Corrective exercises were scheduled for 8 weeks 32 sessions. Participants with tape were present throughout the study along with the taped foot during the day. The measurement of the height of the naval bone and amount of internal arches of the foot were measured and to find the balance it was performed by a posturography apparatus, Sensory organization test (SOT test), which all remeasured after 8 weeks exercises. The computerized dynamic posturography apparatus was the equitest model of the American NeuroCom company, one of the most advanced kinetic variables assessor apparatus that is used to manipulate effective sensory systems in control posture. This device has a unique evaluation technique that provides quantitative data in posture control and it is a suitable tool for analysing age–related changes. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics, covariance analysis , independent t test and paired samples test in significance level 0.05. All data were analysed using SPSS 20 for windows.
Results: The results of covariance analysis showed that, after removing the effect of pre-test scores on post-test scores, there was a significant difference between the two groups in the first (p=0.251), second (p=0.113), third (p=0.071), fourth (p=0.862), fifth (p=0.260) and sixth (p=0.314) balances and the internal longitudinal arch of right foot (p=0.281) and left (p=0.125) and there was no increase in the height of the right naval bone (p=0.136) and the height of the left naval bone (p=0.240) and the use of kinesiotape could not facilitate the effect of corrective exercises; But the results of the paired t-test for intragroup comparisons showed that corrective exercises on the on internal longitudinal arch of right and left foot (p<0.001), increasing the height of the naval bone of the right and left foot (p<0.001) and static balance with eyes closed in the second condition (p<0.001) had a significant effect.
Conclusion: According to this study corrective exercises protocol can improve pronated foot (flat feet deformity) and static balance index in closed eyes position, and the use of the kinesiotape is not affective on improving pronated foot and improving balance index. Therefore, this training protocol can be useful for teenagers suffered pronated foot is to improve internal foot arches and height of the naval bone and static balance in closed eye position.

Full-Text [PDF 706 kb]   (694 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Rehabilitation

References
1. Hertel J, Gay MR, Denegar CR. Differences in postural control during single-leg stance among healthy individuals with different foot types. J Athl Train. 2002;37(2):129–32.
2. Morley JB, Decker LM, Dierks T, Blanke D, French JA, Stergiou N. Effects of varying amounts of pronation on the mediolateral ground reaction forces during barefoot versus shod running. J Appl Biomech. 2010;26(2):205–14. [DOI]
3. Hintermann B, Nigg BM. Pronation in runners: implications for injuries. Sports Medicine. 1998;26(3):169–76. [DOI]
4. Cote KP, Brunet ME, Gansneder BM, Shultz SJ. Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability. J Athl Train. 2005;40(1):41–6.
5. Garcı́a-Rodrı́guez A, Martı́n-Jiménez F, Carnero-Varo M, Gómez-Gracia E, Gómez-Aracena J, Fernández-Crehuet J. Flexible flat feet in children: a real problem? Pediatrics. 1999;103(6):84. [DOI]
6. Radwan NL, Ibrahim MM, Eid MA, Aly SM. The long-term effect of foot insoles on kinetic gait parameters in female children with flexible flat foot. International Medical Journal. 2020;25(2):.485–94.
7. Aydog ST. Relation between foot arch index and ankle strength in elite gymnasts: a preliminary study. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(3):e13. [DOI]
8. Karatas L, Vuralli D, Günendi Z. The effect of medial longitudinal arch height and medial longitudinal arch support insoles on postural balance in perimenopausal women. Turk J Med Sci. 2019;49(3):755–60. [DOI]
9. Levinger P, Murley GS, Barton CJ, Cotchett MP, McSweeney SR, Menz HB. A comparison of foot kinematics in people with normal- and flat-arched feet using the Oxford Foot Model. Gait & Posture. 2010;32(4):519–23. [DOI]
10. Charrette M. Foot pronation and posture. Dynamic Chiropractic. 2004;22(22).
11. Tsai LC, Yu B, Mercer VS, Gross MT. Comparison of different structural foot types for measures of standing postural control. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(12):942–53. [DOI]
12. Lanza IR, Russ DW, Kent-Braun JA. Age-related enhancement of fatigue resistance is evident in men during both isometric and dynamic tasks. J Appl Physiol. 2004;97(3):967–75. [DOI]
13. Shields CA, Needle AR, Rose WC, Swanik CB, Kaminski TW. Effect of elastic taping on postural control deficits in subjects with healthy ankles, copers, and individuals with functional ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(10):1427–35. [DOI]
14. Yoshida A, Kahanov L. The effect of kinesio taping on lower trunk range of motions. Res Sports Med. 2007;15(2):103–12. [DOI]
15. Chang Y, Wu H, Hung W, Chiu Y. Effect of ankle taping on standing balance in the individuals with functional ankle instability. In: 28 International Conference on Biomechanics in Sports [Internet]. Marquette, Michigan, USA; 2010.
16. Mathieson I, Upton D, Prior TD. Examining the validity of selected measures of foot type. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2004;94(3):275–81. [DOI]
17. Staheli LT, Chew DE, Corbett M. The longitudinal arch. a survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(3):426–8.
18. Rithanya P, Babu KY, Mohanraj KG. Assessment of flat foot by plantar arch index using footprint in aged population. Drug Invention Today. 2018;10(11):2142–5.
19. Menz HB, Munteanu SE. Validity of 3 clinical techniques for the measurement of static foot posture in older people. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35(8):479–86. [DOI]
20. Rashidzadeh P, Mousavi Sadati SK. Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on kinetic variables of postural control and balance of elderly people. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2019;9:119. [Persian] [Article]
21. Luque-Suarez A, Gijon-Nogueron G, Baron-Lopez FJ, Labajos-Manzanares MT, Hush J, Hancock MJ. Effects of kinesiotaping on foot posture in participants with pronated foot: a quasi-randomised, double-blind study. Physiotherapy. 2014;100(1):36–40. [DOI]
22. Sivachandiran S, Kumar GV. Effect of corrective exercises programme among athletes with flat feet on foot alignment factors. International Journal of Pysical Education, Sports and Health. 2016;3(6):193–6.
23. Listyorini I, Shanti M, Prabowo T. Effectiveness in dynamic balance: a comparison between foot muscle strengthening using elastic band and without elastic band in children aged 8–12 with flexible flatfeet. International Journal of Integrated Health Sciences. 2015;3(1):26–32. [DOI]
24. Fakoor Rashid H, Daneshmandi H. The effects of a 6 weeks corrective exercise program on improving flat foot and static balance in boys. Journal of Practical Studies of Biosciences in Sport. 2014;1(2):52–66. [Persian] [Article]
25. El-Shamy FF, Ghait AS. Effect of flexible pes planus on postural stability in adolescent females. International Journal of Science and Research(IJSR). 2014;3(7):653–6.
26. Koura GM, Elimy DA, Hamada HA, Fawaz HE, Elgendy MH, Saab IM. Impact of foot pronation on postural stability: an observational study. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017;30(6):1327–32. [DOI]
27. Moon D, Kim K, Lee S. Immediate effect of short-foot exercise on dynamic balance of subjects with excessively pronated feet. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26(1):117–9. [DOI]
28. Chao TC, Jiang B. A comparison of postural stability during upright standing between normal and flatfooted individuals, based on COP-Based Measures. Entropy. 2017;19(2):76. [DOI]
29. Holmes CF, Wilcox D, Fletcher JP. Effect of a modified, low-dye medial longitudinal arch taping procedure on the subtalar joint neutral position before and after light exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002;32(5):194–201. [DOI]
30. Yoon KS, Park SD. The effects of ankle mobilization and active stretching on the difference of weight-bearing distribution, low back pain and flexibility in pronated-foots subjects. J Exer Rehabil. 2013;9(2):292–7. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb