The Relationship Between Self-compassion and Internet Addiction With the Mediating Role of Stress Coping Strategies in the University Students

Irannejad, Elham; Mesbahi, Mahdi; Rahimi, Golnaz

Volume 12 - Articles-1401 MEJDS (2022) 12: 95 | Back to browse issues page

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Irannejad E, Mesbahi M, Rahimi G. The Relationship Between Self-compassion and Internet Addiction With the Mediating Role of Stress Coping Strategies in the University Students. MEJDS 2022; 12 :95-95
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2199-en.html

The Relationship Between Self-compassion and Internet Addiction With the Mediating Role of Stress Coping Strategies in the University Students

Elham Irannejad¹

, Mahdi Mesbahi ^*²

, Golnaz Rahimi³

1- Department of Psychology, Tehran University, Farabi Campus
2- Department of Psychology, Lorestan University
3- Department of Educational Psychology, Kermanshah Azad University Branch

Abstract: (1799 Views)

Background & Objectives: Internet Addiction Disorder (IAD) is characterized by excessive or poorly controlled preoccupations or behaviors regarding that Internet use that leads to impairment or distress. IAD, as a behavioral addiction, has many negative consequences affecting mental health, physical health, and interpersonal relationships. The findings showed that self–compassion is one of the characteristics that can reduce the risk of Internet addiction. Since one of the reasons for the development and continuation of addictive behaviors is stress, the coping strategies employed by people can also affect the risk of Internet addiction. In the task-oriented coping strategy, the individual tries to solve the problem, but in the emotion-oriented coping strategy, the individual tries to reduce negative emotions and avoid stressful situations using the avoidance strategy. The relevant research shows that people using maladaptive coping strategies are more likely to become addicted to the Internet. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the mediating role of stress coping strategies in the relationship between self–compassion and the risk of IAD.
Methods: The present research method was a correlational study using the path analysis method. The statistical population of the present study consisted of the students of Tehran University, Farabi Campus (Qom), studying in the 2018–2019 academic year. Considering the criteria for determining the sample size, 230 students were selected using the available sampling method to complete the research questionnaires. However, 212 questionnaires were returned, and their information was analyzed. The inclusion criterion for the students was access to the Internet (having a smartphone or computer). The exclusion criteria for students were as follows: no access to the Internet and incomplete return of the questionnaires. The Self–Compassion Scale (Neff, 2003), Internet Addiction Questionnaire (Young, 1998), and Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (Endler and Parker, 1990) were used to collect the information. To analyze data, we used descriptive statistics indicators (mean and standard deviation) and the Pearson correlation method and path analysis in SPSS 26 and AMOS 24 software. All statistical analyzes were performed at a significance level of 0.05.
Results: The results of path analysis showed that the path coefficient of self–compassion to the task-oriented coping strategy was positive and significant (p=0.007, b=0.42), and the path coefficient of self–compassion to the emotion-oriented coping strategy was negative and significant (p=0.001, b=–0.65). The path coefficient of task-oriented coping strategy to Internet addiction was negative and significant (p=0.009, b=–0.31), and the path coefficient of emotion-oriented coping strategy to Internet addiction was positive and significant (p=0.007, b=0.44). Self–compassion had no direct effect on Internet addiction; instead, the indirect path coefficient of self–compassion through the mediation of task-oriented and emotion-oriented coping strategies with Internet addiction was negative and significant (p=0.006, b=–0.42). Moreover, the fit indices of the model showed a good fit of the final and modified model with the data (χ²=0.038, p=0.84, GFI=0.99, CFI=0.99, NFI=0.98, RMSEA=0.002).
Conclusion: Findings show that self–compassion can only affect the risk of Internet addiction through task-oriented and emotion-oriented coping strategies. It is helpful to consider these effective mechanisms in preventing and diagnosing IAD.

Keywords: Self–compassion, Internet addiction, Task–Oriented, Emotion–Oriented, Avoidance

Full-Text [PDF 567 kb] (540 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References

1. Young KS. The evolution of internet addiction. Addict Behav. 2017;64:229–30. [DOI]

2. Mamsharifi P, Akbari Bejandi N, Asadi N. Internet addiction prediction modeling based on quality of life and life satisfaction: the mediating role of stress coping strategies. J Psychological Sciences. 2020;19(89):541–51. [Persian] [Article]

3. Bernardi S, Pallanti S. Internet addiction: a descriptive clinical study focusing on comorbidities and dissociative symptoms. Compr Psychiatry. 2009;50(6):510–6. [DOI]

4. Flisher C. Getting plugged in: an overview of internet addiction: getting plugged in. Paediatr Child Health. 2010;46(10):557–9. [DOI]

5. Healy B, Levin E, Perrin K, Weatherall M, Beasley R. Prolonged work- and computer-related seated immobility and risk of venous thromboembolism. J R Soc Med. 2010;103(11):447–54. [DOI]

6. Shahabinejad Z, Zandi S, Azizmohammadi S. Predictability of university students internet addiction based on self-compassion and perceived social support. Knowledge and Research in Applied Psychology. 2017;18(2):80–91. [Persian]

7. Abdolpour G, Shalchi B, Hamzezadeh S, Salehi A. The mediating role of self-esteem on the relationship between emotional dysregulation and compassion with internet addiction. Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry. 2019;6(3):129–43. [Persian] [DOI]

8. Neff KD. The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self Identity. 2003;2(3):223–50. [DOI]

9. Neff K, Germer C. Self-compassion and psychological well-being. In: Seppälä EM, Simon-Thomas E, Brown SL, Worline MC, Cameron CD, Doty JR; editors. The Oxford handbook of compassion science. New York: Oxford University Press; 2017. [DOI]

10. Breines JG, Chen S. Self-compassion increases self-improvement motivation. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012;38(9):1133–43. [DOI]

11. Allen AB, Leary MR. Self-compassion, stress, and coping: self-compassion, stress, and coping. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2010;4(2):107–18. [DOI]

12. Sirois FM, Kitner R, Hirsch JK. Self-compassion, affect, and health-promoting behaviors. Health Psychol. 2015;34(6):661–9. [DOI]

13. Chishima Y, Mizuno M, Sugawara D, Miyagawa Y. The influence of self-compassion on cognitive appraisals and coping with stressful events. Mindfulness. 2018;9(6):1907–15. [DOI]

14. Valentino RJ, Lucki I, Van Bockstaele E. Corticotropin-releasing factor in the dorsal raphe nucleus: Linking stress coping and addiction. Brain Research. 2010;1314:29–37. [DOI]

15. Zhao LY, Shi J, Zhang XL, Epstein DH, Zhang XY, Liu Y, et al. Stress enhances retrieval of drug-related memories in abstinent heroin addicts. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010;35(3):720–6. [DOI]

16. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 1984.

17. Alzoubi FA, Al-Smadi AM, Gougazeh YM. Coping strategies used by syrian refugees in Jordan. Clin Nurs Res. 2019;28(4):396–421. [DOI]

18. Mehrad Sader M, Azami Y, Moatamedy A, Siah Kamari R, Mam Sharifi P. Investigating the role of coping strategies, purposefulness in life, and quality of life in marital adjustment of retirees. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing. 2018;6(2):12–23. [Persian] [Article]

19. Odacı H, Çelik ÇB. Internet dependence in an undergraduate population: the roles of coping with stress, self-efficacy beliefs, and sex role orientation. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2017;55(3):395–409. [DOI]

20. Kline RB. Software review: software programs for structural equation modeling: Amos, EQS, and LISREL. J Psychoeduc Assess. 1998;16(4):343–64. [DOI]

21. Khosravi S, Sadeghi M, Yabandeh M. Psychometric properties of Self-Compassion Scale (SCS). Psychological Methods and Models. 2014;4(13):47–59. [Persian] [Article]

22. Yang CK, Choe BM, Baity M, Lee JH, Cho JS. SCL-90-R and 16PF profiles of senior high school students with excessive internet use. Can J Psychiatry. 2005;50(7):407–14. [DOI]

23. Alavi S. Psychometric properties of Young internet addiction test. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2010;4(3):183–9. [Persian] [Article]

24. Endler NS, Parker JD. Multidimensional assessment of coping: a critical evaluation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;58(5):844–54. [DOI]

25. Ghoreyshi Rad F. Etebar yabi meghyas moghabele ba moghe’iyat haye stress zaye Endler va Parker [Validation scale of coping with stressful situations Endler and Parker]. Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2010;4(1):1–7. [Persian]

26. Meyers LS, Gamst GC, Guarino AJ. Applied multivariate research: design and interpretation. Third edition. New York: Sage Publications; 2016.