Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 137 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Echreshavi M, Khalatbari J, Hosseinpour R. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Davis and Orton Integrated Model Training on Dyslexia in Primary School Students in Ahvaz City, Iran. MEJDS 2022; 12 :137-137
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2315-en.html
1- Islamic Azad University of Tehran North Branch
2- Tonekabon Islamic Azad University
3- Imam Hossein University
Abstract:   (1079 Views)

Background & Objectives: Learning disability is a common childhood disorder. Academic problems are the most important indicator of learning disability that can be seen in various fields. These areas include reading, writing, speaking, and doing math. A reading disorder is a condition in which reading progress is less than expected for the child's age, education, and intelligence. The Davis and Orton methods are multisensory teaching methods emphasizing motor and tactile stimuli with visual and auditory effects. The Davis method consists of two stages. The first is mental imagery and positioning counseling, in which children have concepts of situational recognition and the notion that positioning can be used as a consideration of the situation with events and environmental conditions. The second is the mastery of symbols, which in this way, using the paste, makes special signs such as letters of the alphabet, punctuation marks, and incomprehensible words based on the meaning of the words. In the Orton method, the student is taught to see and pronounce a letter, hear the sound, and write it. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the Davis and Orton integrated model on the rate of dyslexia in primary school students in Ahvaz City, Iran.
Methods: The research method was quasi–experimental with a pretest–posttest design with a control group. This integrated method was designed for the second grade of elementary school. Davis and Orton's approaches were evaluated as a single model and an independent variable on students' dyslexia as a dependent variable. At first, the pretest was taken from the experimental and control groups. Then this method was taught to the experimental group. Finally, after performing the posttest on both groups, the effectiveness of the integrated method was evaluated. The statistical population included all male and female second–grade elementary students in four education districts of Ahvaz (N=16000) studying in normal public schools in the 2018–2019 academic year. A total of 352 male and female students were selected by cluster sampling. The inclusion criteria included studying in the second grade of elementary school, having an IQ above 85 using Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices Test, having two standard deviations below average (score 30) in the Reading and Dyslexia Test (NAMA), lacking behavioral disorders, mental retardation, vision or hearing problems, and not benefiting from learning disabilities training centers. The exclusion criteria were the absence of more than two sessions and the unwillingness to participate in the study. Then, 28 dyslexic students were randomly selected and assigned to the experimental and control groups. Data in the pretest and posttest for two groups were gathered via the Reading and Dyslexia Test (NAMA) (Kormi Nouri and Moradi, 2006). The integrated method of Davis and Orton was presented to the experimental group in fourteen 45–minute group sessions (seven persons in each group). In this study, descriptive statistics (frequency, mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (Independent t test to compare the age of two groups and univariate covariance analysis) were used for analyzing data in SPSS software version 22. P values less than 0.05 were considered the acceptable significance level for statistical tests.
Results: The findings showed that the effectiveness of teaching the Davis and Orton integrated model was effective in reducing dyslexia related to reading words with high/medium/low–frequency words (p=0.001), word chain (p=0.004), rhyme (p=0.008), naming pictures (p=0.023), text comprehension (p=0.011), word comprehension (p=0.023), non–word reading (p=0.001), letter signs (p=0.009), and the symptoms of the category (p=0.013). However, it was ineffective in reducing dyslexia related to the elimination of sounds in the experimental group (p=0.141).
Conclusion: According to the study findings, teaching an integrated model of Davis and Orton to dyslexic students is a suitable and effective method to reduce dyslexia in students with this disability.

Full-Text [PDF 522 kb]   (289 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Rehabilitation

References
1. Hossein Khanzadeh AA. Ravan shenasi va amoozeshe koodakan va nojavanan ba niyaz haye vizhe [Psychology and education of children and young people with special needs]. Tehran: Avaye Noor Pub; 2015. [Persian]
2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. 5th edition. Arlington, VA, US: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc; 2013.
3. Ahromi R, Shoushtari M, Golshani Manzeh F, Kamarzarin H. Effectiveness of precision teaching on reading ability of students with Reading learning disability. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals. 2011;1(3):139–52. [Persian] [Article]
4. Salmi J, Nyberg L, Laine M. Working memory training mostly engages general-purpose large-scale networks for learning. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;93:108–22. [DOI]
5. Roeser RW, Lau S. On academic identity formation in middle school settings during early adolescence: a motivational-contextual perspective. In: Brinthaupt TM, Lipka RP; editors. Understanding early adolescent self and identity: applications and interventions. State University of New York Press; 2002.
6. Fraga González G, Žarić G, Tijms J, Bonte M, Blomert L, Van Der Molen MW. A randomized controlled trial on the beneficial effects of training letter-speech sound integration on reading fluency in children with dyslexia. Plos One. 2015;10(12):e0143914. [DOI]
7. Jeyasekaran J. Effectiveness of visual auditory kinesthetic tactile technique on reading level among children with dyslexia at Helikx open school and learning centre, Salem. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2015;4(3):315–18. [DOI]
8. Kast M, Baschera GM, Gross M, Jäncke L, Meyer M. Computer-based learning of spelling skills in children with and without dyslexia. Ann of Dyslexia. 2011;61(2):177–200. [DOI]
9. Davis RD. Davis dyslexia association international. Positive aspects of dyslexia. Retrieved December 11, 2007.
10. Hallahan DP, Lloyd JW, Kaufman JM, Weiss MP, Martinez EA. Learning disabilities: foundations, characteristics, and effective teaching. Third edition. Boston: Pearson; 2005.
11. Delavar A. Mabani nazari va elmi pazhouhesh dar oloum ensani va ejtemaei [Theoretical and practical foundations of research in humanities and social sciences]. Tehran: Roshd Pub; 2014. [Persian]
12. Raven JC. Guide to using the Coloured Progressive Matrices Sets A, Ab, B (revised Order, 1956). London: H.K Lewis & Co, Ltd; 1956.
13. Kormi Noori R, Moradi A. Design Study of Reading and Dyslexia in Bilingual and Monolingual Children. Tehran: Organization for Educational Research and Planning; 2006. [Persian].
14. Rahmani J, Abedi MR. Hanjar yabi azmoon raven rangi koodakan 5-10 sale dar ostane Isfahan [Standardization of Raven Color Test for children aged 5-10 years children in Isfahan Province]. Journal of Doctorine [Faslname Amoozeh]; 2003. [Persian]
15. Hosseini M, Moradi A, Kormi Nouri R, Hassani J, Parhoon H. Reliability and validity of Reading and Dyslexia Test (NEMA). Advances in Cognitive Science. 2016;18(1):22–34. [Persian] [Article]
16. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology. 1975;28(4):563–75. [DOI]
17. Dibazar M, Panahali A. Comparison of the effectiveness training of multisensory Fernald and Everton method on improving dyslexia in dyslexic students in elementary school. Rooyesh. 2020;9(8):101–10. [Persian] [Article]
18. Engelbrecht RJ. The effects of the Ron Davis programme on the reading ability and psychological functioning of children [Thesis for MSc]. [Stellenbosch, South Africa]: Stellenbosch University; 2005.
19. Castro CV. The effects of modified Orton - Gillingham instructional strategies on phonological processing deficits in a first – year college Spanish students [PhD dissertation]. [Spain]: Purdue University; 2006.
20. Marshall A, Smith L, Borger-Smith S. Davis program average reading gains. Davis Dyslexia Association International [Internet]. 2009.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb