Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 143 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Turkmani H, Ghasemi Mutlaq M, Ismaili Shad B, Mohammadipour M. Predicting the Mean Score of Tendency to Addiction Based on Parenting Styles and Cognitive Emotion Regulation of University Students. MEJDS 2022; 12 :143-143
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2489-en.html
Predicting the Mean Score of Tendency to Addiction Based on Parenting Styles and Cognitive Emotion Regulation of University Students
Hossein Turkmani1 , Mehdi Ghasemi Mutlaq *2 , Behrang Ismaili Shad3 , Mohammad Mohammadipour4
1- Doctoral student of general psychology, Bojnord branch, Islamic Azad University
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Bojnord Branch, Islamic Azad University
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Bojnord Branch, Islamic Azad University
4- Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Qochan Branch, Islamic Azad University
Abstract:   (1055 Views)

Background & Objectives: Higher education is considered a great stage of life in spite of their problems. These problems may lead to the possibility of experiencing and suffering from some social harms, including addiction. The tendency of students towards drugs and their harms is one of the main areas of addiction prevention programs related to students. One of the variables affecting the tendency to addiction is parenting styles which is a set of behaviors that determine the parent–child interactions in different and extended situations. Parenting styles include authoritarian, authoritative and permissive styles. Another variable affecting the tendency to addiction is cognitive emotion regulation. Emotion regulation refers to the processes by which a person experiences emotions and how to express them. Today, addiction tendency is considered an effective factor that has changed the parenting style. This endovear requires improving cognitive emotion regulation in learners. Therefore, according to what was stated, this study aimed to predict the tendency to addiction based on parenting styles and emotional cognitive tension in students.
Methods: This study was cross–sectional and the research method was descriptive–analytical of correlational type. The statistical population of this study consisted of all students of Payame Noor University in Gonbad Kavous City, Iran, in the academic year of 2019–2020. There were 3548 students. The sampling method considered the possibility of a drop in respondents and inappropriate responses. Thus, 400 hundred questionnaires were distributed among all university students. Finally, 390 questionnaires were returned and 384 questionnaires were selected for statistical analysis. The inclusion criteria were being a student of Payam Noor University in the city of Gonbad Kavos and studying in the academic year of 2018–2019. The exclusion criterion was incomplete questionnaires. The measuring instruments were the Parenting Style Questionnaire (Baumrind, 1991), Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Garenfeski et al., 2001) and Tendency to Addiction Scale (Weed et al., 1992). Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (the Pearson correlation coefficient and multivariate regression analysis) were performed in SPSS version 22. The significance level of the tests was set at 0.05.
Results: The results showed that between permissive style (p<0.001, r=0.491), authoritative style (p<0.001, r=–0.523), authoritarian style (p<0.001, r=0.406) and emotional cognitive regulation (p< 0.001, r=0.475) were correlated with addiction tendency. Also, based on the results of multiple linear regression analysis, permissive style (p<0.001, β=0.203), authoritative style (p<0.001, β=0.274), authoritarian style (p<0.001, β=.193), and cognitive regulation of emotion (p<0.001, β=0.315) could predict the mean score of addiction tendency.
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, using the correct parenting styles and improving cognitive emotion regulation can reduce the tendency to addiction in University students.

Keywords: Addiction tendency, Parenting styles, Cognitive emotion regulation, Students
Full-Text [PDF 479 kb]   (320 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology
References
1. Dick DM, Hancock LC. Integrating basic research with prevention/intervention to reduce risky substance use among college students. Front Psychol. 2015;6:544. [DOI]
2. Perski O, Herd N, West R, Brown J. Perceived addiction to smoking and associations with motivation to stop, quit attempts and quitting success: A prospective study of English smokers. Addictive Behaviors. 2019;90:306–11. [DOI]
3. Bassak Nejad S, Hatami Sarbarzeh M, Zargar Y. The effect of cognitive behavioral group therapy on thought- action fusion, thought suppression and guilt feeling of university students. Journal of Behavioral Sciences 2013;7(1):7–12. [Persian] [Article]
4. Garcia OF, Serra E, Zacares JJ, Calafat A, Garcia F. Alcohol use and abuse and motivations for drinking and non-drinking among Spanish adolescents: do we know enough when we know parenting style? Psychol Health. 2020;35(6):645–64. [DOI]
5. Harandi V, Soltani A, Manzari Tavakoli A, Zeinadini Z. The role of marital satisfaction and parenting style in function reading in children with specific learning disorder. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2018;8:62. [Persian] [Article]
6. Habibi M, Haji Sheykhi M, Lavaf H. The relationship between paternal lifestyle and parenting style: the role of father's drug addiction. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2016;21(4):297–307. [Persian] [Article]
7. Berge J, Sundell K, Öjehagen A, Hakansson A. Role of parenting styles in adolescent substance use: results from a Swedish longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(1):e008979. [DOI]
8. Vahid B. The predicted role of parenting styles in man treated for substance abuse. J Neurosurgery and Neurology Research. 2020;1(1).1-3. doi: [DOI]
9. Clarke PB, Lewis TF, Myers JE, Henson RA, Hill B. Wellness, emotion regulation, and relapse during substance use disorder treatment. Journal of Counseling & Development. 2020;98(1):17–28. [DOI]
10. Abooie B, Amiri M. Relationship between perceived stress, frustration tolerance, cognitive emotion regulation with depression syndrome. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2019;9:79. [Persian] [Article]
11. McKee K, Russell M, Mennis J, Mason M, Neale M. Emotion regulation dynamics predict substance use in high-risk adolescents. Addict Behav. 2020;106:106374. [DOI]
12. Wilcox CE, Pommy JM, Adinoff B. Neural circuitry of impaired emotion regulation in substance use disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2016;173(4):344–61. [DOI]
13. Sloan E, Hall K, Moulding R, Bryce S, Mildred H, Staiger PK. Emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic treatment construct across anxiety, depression, substance, eating and borderline personality disorders: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2017;57:141–63. [DOI]
14. Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1970;30(3):607–10.
15. Baumrind D. Effective parenting during the early adolescent transition. In: Cowan PA, Hetherington M; editors. Family transitions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1991.
16. Minaei A, Nikzad S. The factor structure and validity of the Persian version of the Baumrind Parenting Style Inventory. Journal of Family Research. 2017;13(1):92–108. [Persian]
17. Garnefski N, Kraaij V, Spinhoven P. Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation, and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences. 2001;30:1311–27. doi: [DOI]
18. Khoshzamir Sh, Binesh M. Rabeteye beyn rahbord haye tanzime shenakhti hayajan va khallaghiat hayajani be behdasht ravani daneshjouyan [The relationship between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and emotional creativity with mental health of students]. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences. 2016;10(33):85–100. [Persian] [Article]
19. Weed NC, Butcher JN, McKenna T, Ben-Porath YS. New measures for assessing alcohol and drug abuse with the MMPI-2: the APS and AAS. J Pers Assess. 1992;58(2):389–404. [DOI]
20. Zargar Y, Najarian B, Naami AZ. Barrasiye rabetey vizhegi haye shakhsiati (hayajan khahi, ebraz vojoud, sarsakhti ravanshenakhti), negaresh mazhabi va rezayat zanashooei ba amadegi etiad be mavad mokhaddar dar karkonan yek Sherkat sanati dar Ahvaz [The relationship of some personality variables, religious attitudes and marital satisfaction with addiction potential in personnel of an industrial factory in Ahvaz]. Journal of Educaton and Psychology. 2008;15(1):99–120. [Persian]
21. Ahmadi V, Banijamali Sh, Sarami Gh. The relationship between parenting styles and addiction potentiality in Ilam high school students: the mediating role of novelty seeking. Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences. 2017;25(3):117–24. [Persian] [DOI]
22. Zeinali A, Vahdat R, Garadingeh K. The relationship between parenting style and addiction susceptibility in children. Journal of Family Research. 2010;6(3):335–52. [Persian] [Article]
23. Sadri Demirchi E, Kiani A. The prediction of tendency to addiction based on social self-esteem and cognitive emotion regulation in university students. Culture in The Islamic University. 2018;8(2):289–306. [Persian] [Article]
24. Sepehri M, Kiani Q. The relationship between cognitive emotion regulation and addiction tendency: the mediating roles of social and emotional loneliness and early maladaptive schemas. Etiadpajohi. 2020;14(56):313–38. [Persian] [DOI]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb