Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 208 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Golkar T, Golparvar M, Aghaei A. Comparing the Effectiveness of the Native Schema Therapy With Young Schema Therapy on Early Maladaptive Schemas and Attitudes Toward Infidelity of Conflicting Couples. MEJDS 2022; 12 :208-208
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2549-en.html
1- PhD Student in Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Isfahan, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Isfahan, Iran
3- Professor, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Isfahan, Iran
Abstract:   (937 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: The health and dynamism of the family and society are rooted in the health and vitality of couples. One of the issues that is of special importance in the study of couples' relationships is schemas. Schemas are formed in the early years of life and affect a person's life in the later years of adulthood. Schema therapy has been effective in most studies, but the major drawback of schema therapy in our country is the lack of its complete consistency with our native culture. Cultural schemas are dependent on the culture and different from one culture to another; of course, they can also overlap. Despite various schematic therapy models from foreign sources, it seems that the use of indigenous schematic therapy that is consistent with Iranian culture will help solve the problems of conflicting Iranian couples. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of indigenous schema therapy with Young's schema therapy on early maladaptive schemas and attitudes toward infidelity in conflicting couples.
Methods: In terms of purpose, this study was applied and in terms of methodology, quasi-experimental with a pretest-posttest and follow-up design with a control group. The study population comprised all couples with conflicts referred to counseling centers in Isfahan City, in 2017. Forty-eight eligible individuals from this population volunteered for the study and then were randomly divided into three groups (native schema therapy, Young therapy schema, and control group). The inclusion criteria were as follows: filing a case in the family counseling centers of Isfahan city, less than one year has passed since the filing of the case, education at least diploma, not participating in other psychological treatments at the same time, Not suffering from mental disorders, lacking a history of psychosis, mania, hypomania or any other diagnosed personality disorder, and not taking drugs, drugs or alcohol. The exclusion criteria were as follows: lack of therapeutic motivation (according to the therapist's diagnosis and based on not following up and not doing therapy assignments), absence of more than two sessions in schema therapies, and decision to divorce. Individuals in all three groups were assessed in three stages: pretest, posttest, and follow-up by the Early Maladaptive Schema Scale (EMSS) (Young, 2005) and Attitudes Toward Infidelity Scale (Whatley, 2008). For the first experimental group, the native schema therapy was implemented in fourteen 90-minute sessions and for the second experimental group, Young's schema therapy was implemented in fourteen 90-minute sessions. The analysis of the collected data was done through descriptive statistics of central tendency and dispersion indicators (mean, standard deviation, and standard error) for the research groups in the pretest, posttest and follow-up. Also, at the level of inferential statistics, repeated measurement variance analysis and the Bonferroni post hoc test were used at the minimum acceptable significance level equal to 0.05. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 24 software.
Results: In the attitude to infidelity, the effects of time (p<0.001), group (p<0.001), and the interaction of time and group (p<0.001) were significant. Also in maladaptive schemas, the effects of time (p<0.05), group (except for the schemas of mistrust, vulnerability to the detriment, self-sacrifice) (p<0.05) and the interaction of time and group (p<0.05) were significant.  Comparing the effectiveness of the two therapies, the results showed a significant difference between the effectiveness of the indigenous schema-therapy package with Young's schema-therapy on reducing attitudes toward infidelity (p=0.022) and social isolation (p=0.048), but no significant difference (p>0.05)between them on emotional deprivation, rejection, shame, failure, dependence, entanglement, information, self-sacrifice, emotional inhibition, stubbornness, bigotry, inadequate self-discipline, acceptance, negativity, and punishment. Also, native schema therapy and Young schema therapy were not effective in reducing distrust and vulnerability to the detriment schemas (p>0.05).
Conclusion: Based on the study’s findings, interventions of native schema therapy and Young schema therapy lead to a reduction of initial maladaptive schemata and attitudes of infidelity in conflicting couples. However, the native schema therapy is more effective than Young's schema therapy.

Full-Text [PDF 949 kb]   (257 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Lavergne F, Marie N, Mehran F. The 5 mental dimensions identified in early maladaptive schemas statistical analysis of Young’s Schema Questionnaire (YSQ-s3). Encephale. 2015;41(4):314–22. [French] [DOI]
2. Sodani M, Karimi J, Mehrabizadeh M, Neisi A. Effectiveness of emotion-oriented couple therapy on reducing the damage caused by marital infidelity. Journal of Research in Behavioural Sciences. 2013;10(4):258–68. [Persian]
3. Glass SP, Wright TL. Reconstructing marriages after the trauma of infidelity. In: Clinical handbook of marriage and couples interventions. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1997. pp: 471–507.
4. Young JE. Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: a schema–focused approach. 3rd ed. Sarasota, FL, England: Professional Resource Exchange, Inc; 1999.
5. Young JE, Klosko JS, Weishaar ME. Schema therapy: a practitioner’s guide. New York: The Guilford Press; 2003.
6. Khajerasouli M. Barrasi asarbakhshi darman bar asas roykard tarhvare–mehvar bar afzayesh rezayat zanashouie zanan khabgahhaye daneshkade ravanshenasi va oloum tarbiati daneshgah Allameh Tabataba'i [The effectiveness of schema–based treatment on increasing marital satisfaction of women in Psychology and Educational Scinece Faculty of Allameh Tabataba'i University] [Thesis for M.A.]. [Tehran, Iran]: Allameh Tabataba'i University; 2009. [Persian]
7. Hamidpour H. Barrasi moghadamati karaie va asarbakhshi tarhvare darmani dar darman shekast–haye eshghi daneshjouyan [Preliminary study of the effectiveness and efficiency of schema therapy in the treatment of students' love failure]. In: 4th National Seminar on Health and Mental Health of Students. Iran, Shiraz: SID; 2007. [Persian] [Article]
8. Amani A. Karaie asarbakhshi tarhvare darmani va barrasi tarhvare–haye ghaleb dar darman yek more dba moshkel khianat zanashouie [The effectiveness of schema therapy and the study of dominant schemas in the treatment of a case of marital infidelity (extramarital affair)]. In: The 5th Family and Sexual Health Congress. Iran, Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University; 2012. [Persian]
9. Patterson GR, Hops H, Weiss RL. Interpersonal skills training for couples in early stages of conflict. Journal of Marriage and Family. 1975;37(2):295–303. [DOI]
10. Arntz A. Schema–focused therapy for borderline personality disorder: effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, evidence from a multicenter trial. European Psychiatry. 2008;23(S2):S65–6. [DOI]
11. Lobbestael J, Arntz A, Bernstein DP. Disentangling the relationship between different types of childhood maltreatment and personality disorders. J Pers Disord. 2010;24(3):285-95. [DOI]
12. Nadort M, Arntz A, Smit JH, Giesen-Bloo J, Eikelenboom M, Spinhoven P, et al. Implementation of outpatient schema therapy for borderline personality disorder with versus without crisis support by the therapist outside office hours: a randomized trial. Behav Res Ther. 2009;47(11):961–73. [DOI]
13. Daneshmandi S, Izadikhah Z, Kazemi H, Mehrabi H. The effectiveness of emotional schema therapy on emotional schemas of female victims of child abuse and neglect. Journal of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences. 2014;22(5):1481–94. [Persian] [Article]
14. Sharifian F. Cultural conceptualisations and language: theoretical framework and applications. Ardebili L. (Persian translator). Tehran: Neviseh Parsi Pub; 2014.
15. Gall MD, Gall JP, Borg WR. Educational research: an introduction. Nasr AR. (Persian translator). Tehran: SAMT Pub; 2008.
16. Whatley MA. Attitudes Toward Infidelity Scale. Journal Social Psychology. 2008; 133(1):547-51.
17. Shahabi B. The relationship between maladaptive schemas and attachment styles in desiring to get divorced among married couples in Isfahan [Thesis for M.A]. [Isfahan, Iran]: Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Khorasgan Azad University; 2014. [Persian]
18. Whatley MA. Attitudes toward infidelity scale. In: Knox D, Schacht C. Choices in relationships: an introduction marriage and the family. 11th ed. Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth Publishing. 2012, p:415.
19. Habibi M, Sayed Alitabar SH, Pouravari M, Salehi S. Reliability, validity and factor structure for the attitudes toward infidelity scale. Journal of Research and Health. 2019;9(4):294–301. [DOI]
20. Alitabar SH, Ghanbari S, Zadeh Mohammadi A, Habibi M. The relationship between premarital sex and attitudes toward infidelity. Journal of Family Research. 2014;10(2):255–67. [Persian] [Article]
21. Young, JE. Schema therapy-complete packet. Cognitive centers of New York & Connecticut; 2005.
22. Schmidt NB, Joiner TE, Young JE, Telch MJ. The Schema Questionnaire: investigation of psychometric properties and the hierarchical structure of a measure of maladaptive schemas. Cogn Ther Res. 1995;19(3):295–321. [DOI]
23. Yousefi N, Etemadi O, Bahrami F, Ahmadi SA, Fatehi zadah MAS. Comparing early maladaptive schemas among divorced and non-divorced couples as predictors of divorce. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2010;16(1):21–33. [Persian] [Article]
24. Golkar T, Golparvar M, Aghaei A. Comparison of the effectiveness of indigenous schema therapy with Yang schema therapy on emotional regulation and desire for divorce in conflicting couples. Med J Mashhad Uni Med Sci. 2021;64(3):3072–82. [Persian] [DOI]
25. Long LL, Young ME. Counseling and therapy for couples. 2nd ed. Belmont, US: Thomson Brooks/Cole; 2007.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb