Determining the Effectiveness of Narrative Therapy on the Quality of Marital Life and Attachment of Disabled Couples Referring to Counseling Centers in Isfahan City, Iran

Khajeh, Amir Hesam; Farhadi, Hadi; Aghaei, Asghar

Volume 12 - Articles-1401 MEJDS (2022) 12: 172 | Back to browse issues page

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Khajeh A H, Farhadi H, Aghaei A. Determining the Effectiveness of Narrative Therapy on the Quality of Marital Life and Attachment of Disabled Couples Referring to Counseling Centers in Isfahan City, Iran. MEJDS 2022; 12 :172-172
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2587-en.html

Determining the Effectiveness of Narrative Therapy on the Quality of Marital Life and Attachment of Disabled Couples Referring to Counseling Centers in Isfahan City, Iran

Amir Hesam Khajeh¹

, Hadi Farhadi ^*²

, Asghar Aghaei³

1- PhD Student in Counseling, Department of Psychology, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran;
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3- Professor, Department of Psychology, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract: (957 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Satisfactory marriage is one of the most important factors in couples' mental health, but if married life does not provide favorable conditions to meet the psychological needs of couples, it will have negative effects. Mental disorders, depression, and suicide are some of the consequences of this problem. To solve these problems and issues, narrative therapy can be used. Narrative therapy helps people to facilitate the separation between the person and the problem by externalizing the problem as a primary process, and by relying on the abilities, beliefs and competencies of the people, it can reduce the influence of the problems and make the problems flexible and solvable. The present study investigated the effectiveness of narrative therapy on the quality of marital life, and the dimensions of attachment of disabled couples referring to counseling centers in Isfahan.
Methods: The present study is a one–case experimental design that was conducted in 2019. The statistical population of the study was all disabled couples referring to psychology and counseling centers and clinics in Isfahan City, Iran. Of them, three couples were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria by accessible and purposeful sampling. After initial sampling, three couples were placed in the group of narrative therapy. The inclusion criteria were as follows: being in marital turmoil based on the interview and also obtaining a score lower than 101 on the Marital Adjustment Scale (MAS), lacking a history of mental disorder based on the clinical interview, having at least a diploma, being at least 20 and at most 50 years old, passing at least 1 year of cohabitation, having this marriage is their first marriage, living together in the same house while conducting research, and not using concomitant psychological therapies. The exclusion criteria include failure to perform the assignments presented in the sessions, unwillingness to cooperate, history of substance abuse or dependence on the substance, use of psychiatric medication prescribed, and absence of more than two sessions. It should be noted to determine the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we used the structured clinical interview, Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory–III, and diagnostic interview of clinical psychologist. The subjects were selected from couples who were referred to counseling centers and psychological services in Isfahan and had marital problems. After a diagnostic interview and identifying the couples who meet the inclusion criteria, the couples were placed in the narrative therapy group. For gathering data Marital Quality of Life (Relationships) Questionnaire (MQL) (Fletcher et al., 2000) and the Revised Adult Attachment Scale (RAAS) (Collins & Read, 1990) were used. To perform the treatment methods, the first couple in the group entered the treatment plan, and at the stage of the baseline (for two weeks), all research tools were performed on them. The treatment was then presented for 12 weekly sessions for the narrative therapy group. To control the unwanted and possible interfering variables and according to the principles of multiple baseline designs in the second session of the first couple, the second couple in both groups entered the treatment plan and so on in the third session of the first couple and the second session of the second couple, the treatment plan was started for the third couple in both groups. All questionnaires were completed in sessions 3, 6, and 8 and immediately after completing treatment. For follow–up, subjects were re–evaluated two months after the treatment. The reliable change index (RCI) and recovery percentage were used to analyze the research data and evaluate the effectiveness of narrative therapy.
Results: Based on the results, in the quality of married life variable, the reliable change index (RCI) in the second (2.19) and third (4.04) couples was statistically significant, which showed the effectiveness of the treatment. For the secure attachment style variable, the RCI in the second couple (2.18) was statistically significant and the treatment was effective only in the second couple. For the ambivalent/anxious style variable, considering that the RCI values in the first (0.51), second (0.17), and third (0.17) couples were less than Z=1.96, the treatment has not been effective for this variable.
Conclusion: Narrative therapy improves the quality of married life and the secure attachment style of some couples; Therefore, this approach can be used to improve interpersonal and marital issues and reduce the rate of divorce in society.

Keywords: Narrative Therapy, Marital quality of life, Attachment styles, Couples, Isfahan

Full-Text [PDF 946 kb] (452 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Counseling

References

1. McNelis M, Segrin C. Insecure attachment predicts history of divorce, marriage, and current relationship status. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2019;60:404–17. [DOI]

2. Nooripour R, Abdi MR, Bakhshani S, Alikhani M, Hosseinian S, Ebrahim TP. Exploring validity and reliability of internet infidelity questionnaire among internet users in Iran. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2017;6(1); e34928. [DOI]

3. Christensen A, Doss BD. Integrative behavioral couple therapy. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017;13:111–4. [DOI]

4. Zhang H, Spinrad TL, Eisenberg N, Luo Y, Wang Z. Young adults’ internet addiction: prediction by the interaction of parental marital conflict and respiratory sinus arrhythmia. Int J Psychophysiol. 2017;120:148–56. [DOI]

5. Norton R. Measuring marital quality: a critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1983;45:141–51. [DOI]

6. Bookwala J. Marital quality as a moderator of the effects of poor vision on quality of life among older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011;66(5):605–16. [DOI]

7. Gera M, Kaur J. Study of resilience and parenting styles of adolescents. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach and Studies. 2015;2(1):168–77.

8. Johnson SM, Whiffent VE. Farayandhaye delbastegi dar zojdarmani va khanevade darmani [Attachment processes in couple and family therapy]. Bahrami F. (translator). 1st ed. Tehran: Danjeh; 2009. [Persian]

9. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1982;52(4):664–78. [DOI]

10. Owen J, Duncan B, Anker M, Sparks J. Initial relationship goal and couple therapy outcomes at post and six–month follow–up. J Fam Psychol. 2012;26(2):179–86. [DOI]

11. Atkins DC, Eldridge KA, Baucom DH, Christensen A. Infidelity and behavioral couple therapy: optimism in the face of betrayal. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73(1):144–50. [DOI]

12. Rathgeber M, Bürkner PC, Schiller EM, Holling H. The efficacy of emotionally focused couples therapy and behavioral couples therapy: a meta–analysis. J Marital Fam Ther. 2019;45(3):447–63. [DOI]

13. Fletcher GJ, Simpson JA, Thomas G. Ideals, perceptions, and evaluations in early relationship development. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;79(6):933–40. [DOI]

14. Dolatshahi M, Ghazi P, Feizy V, Hemami MR. Life quality assessment among patients with vitiligo: comparison of married and single patients in Iran. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2008;74(6):700. [DOI]

15. Nilforooshan P, Ahmadi A, Fatehizadeh M, Reza Abedi M, Ghasemi V. The simultaneous effects of general factor of personality and attachment dimensions on marital quality. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2014;4(3):473-507. [Article]

16. Collins NL, Read SJ. Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990;58(4):644-63. [DOI]

17. Koohsar AAH, Bonab BG. Relation between quality of attachment and life satisfaction in high school administrators. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011;30:954–8. [DOI]

18. Dalrymple KL, Clark H, Chelminski I, Zimmerman M. The interaction between mindfulness, emotion regulation, and social anxiety and its association with emotional eating in bariatric surgery candidates. Mindfulness. 2018;9(6):1780–93. [DOI]

19. Skerrett K. “Good enough stories”: helping couples invest in one another’s growth. Fam Process. 2010;49(4):503–16. [DOI]

20. Vromans LP, Schweitzer RD. Narrative therapy for adults with major depressive disorder: improved symptom and interpersonal outcomes. Psychother Res. 2011;21(1):4–15. [DOI]

21. Genç E, Baptist J. Managing conflict with parents–in–law in a secular society steeped in islamic traditions: perspectives of married turkish couples. Journal of Family Psychotherapy. 2019;30(1):20–39. [DOI]

22. Hee CWH, Sandberg JG, Yorgason JB, Miller RB. Can attachment behaviors moderate the influence of conflict styles on relationship quality? Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy. 2019 Oct 2;18(4):281–302. [DOI]

23. Delatorre MZ, Wagner A. How do couples disagree? An analysis of conflict resolution profiles and the quality of romantic relationships. Revista Colombiana de Psicología. 2019;28:91–108. [DOI]