Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 227 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Almaleki A, Sohrabi M, Taheri H R, Attarzadeh Hosseyni S R. Psychometric Properties of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test in Iraqi Children Aged 5 to 7 Years. MEJDS 2022; 12 :227-227
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2663-en.html
1- PhD Student, Department of Sports Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
2- Professor, Department of Sports Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract:   (1094 Views)

Background & Objectives: Assessment of motor skills paves the way for detecting functional disorders and defects in the body structures and the child's interactions with their surroundings. While analyzing it and its factors affecting the importance of motor skills, experts have developed many tests and techniques to detect motor abnormalities. Most motor growth tests can convert qualitative characteristics of movement into quantitative ones; therefore, they provide objective criteria for investigating and detecting delay and slowness in motor development. One of the best tools for identifying developmental motor delays and motor problems in children is the Bruininks–Oseretsky motor skills tool. Psychometrics of motor skills have had different results in different societies and cultures. Hence, the present study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the Bruininks–Oseretsky test in Iraqi boys aged 5 to 7 years.
Methods:The present cross–sectional study was a tool development and the research design. The study's statistical population included Iraqi boys in the age range of 5 to 7 years. The sample included 400 Iraqi boys selected by cluster sampling among those eligible for the study from different parts of Iraq. Children with neurological and musculoskeletal injuries were excluded from the study. The Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (1950) was used in this study. This set of reference norm tests assesses the motor performance of children aged 4.5 to 14.6 years. This test consists of 8 subscales and 46 items that evaluate motor proficiency or movement disorders in gross and fine motor skills. Four subscales measure gross motor skills, three measure fine motor skills, and one measures both motor skills. Motor proficiency test subscales include running speed and agility, balance, coordination of friendship, strength, upper limb coordination, response speed, visual–motor control, and upper limb speed and agility. The Cronbach alpha, intra–class correlation coefficient, test–retest, and confirmatory factor analysis were used to analyze the data. SPSS statistical software version 20 and LISREL were used to analyze the data. A significance level of α = 0.05 was considered significant for statistical calculations.
Results: The results showed that the Bruininks–Oseretsky test and its subscales have the necessary internal reliability and consistency in the community of Iraqi boys aged 5 to 7 years. The reliability coefficients of 0.80, 0.82, 0.70, and 0.86 were calculated for the subscales of motor proficiency of gross skills, fine skills, upper limb coordination, and the whole test. This test has the necessary time reliability (p<0.001). The test–retest reliability coefficients were calculated to be 0.86, 0.82, 0.88, and 0.83, respectively, for motor proficiency in gross skills, fine skills, upper limb coordination, and the whole test. The reliability (between the evaluator and the evaluator) of this test was also at a desirable level (p<0.001). So that the intra–rater reliability with coefficients of 0.82, 0.86, 0.84, and 0.85 and the inter–rater reliability with coefficients of 0.90, 0.85, 0.89, and 0.88 for the subscales of gross skills, fine skills, coordination of upper limb, and the whole test were calculated. In this study, the content validity of this test was also confirmed so that this index was calculated in the range of 0.8 to 1 for the subscales of gross skills, fine skills, and the whole test. Fit goodness indices were calculated as χ2/df=2.84, RMSEA=0.074, RMR=0.023, GFI=0.91, and AGFI=0.90. The study results showed that the Bruininks–Oseretsky Test and the subscales of gross skills, fine skills, and the whole test in the community of Iraqi boys aged 5 to 7 years have appropriate and acceptable validity and reliability.
Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, the Bruininks–Oseretsky Test can be used with confidence to assess motor proficiency in the community, and for use in girls and other age groups, it is necessary to design and implement additional studies in the future.

Full-Text [PDF 424 kb]   (559 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Gabbard C. Lifelong motor development. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2016.
2. Robinson LE, Stodden DF, Barnett LM, Lopes VP, Logan SW, Rodrigues LP, et al. Motor competence and its effect on positive developmental trajectories of health. Sports Med. 2015;45(9):1273–84. [DOI]
3. Alipour A, Ghadami A, Alipour Z, Abdollahzadeh H. Preliminary validation of the Corona Disease Anxiety Scale (CDAS) in the Iranian sample. Quarterly Journal of Health Psychology. 2020;8(4):163–75. [Persian] [Article]
4. Cools W, De Martelaer K, Samaey C, Andries C. Movement skill assessment of typically developing preschool children: a review of seven movement skill assessment tools. J sports Sci Med. 2009;8(2):154–68.
5. Bruininks RH, Bruininks BD. Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, (BOT-2). American Psychological Association; 2005. [DOI]
6. Wuang YP, Su CY. Reliability and responsiveness of the Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition in children with intellectual disability. Res Dev Disabil. 2009;30(5):847–55. [DOI]
7. Ferreira L, Vieira JLL, Rocha FF Da, Silva PN Da, Cheuczuk F, Caçola P, et al. Percentile curves for Brazilian children evaluated with the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, 2nd Edition. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2020;22:e65027. [DOI]
8. Brown T. Structural validity of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency–Second Edition (BOT–2) subscales and composite scales. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention. 2019;12(3):323–53. [DOI]
9. Monazam M, Laal F, Sarsangi V, Fallahmadvari R, Najafi K, Fallahmadvari A. Designing and determination of validity and reliability of the questionnaire increasing the duration of using the hearing protection device by workers based on BASNEF model. Scientific Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences. 2018;25(6):21–8. [Persian] [DOI]
10. Wagner MO, Webster EK, Ulrich DA. Psychometric properties of the Test of Gross Motor Development, Third Edition (German translation): results of a pilot study. J Mot Learn Dev. 2017;5(1):29–44. [DOI]
11. Ulrich DA. Introduction to the special section: evaluation of the psychometric properties of the TGMD–3. J Mot Learn Dev. 2017;5(1):1–4. [DOI]
12. Pasha Sharifi H. Osoule Ravan sanji va ravan azmaei [Principles of psychometrics and psychotesting]. Tehran: Roshd Pub; 2004. [Persian]
13. Deitz JC, Kartin D, Kopp K. Review of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, second edition (BOT–2). Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2007;27(4):87–102. [DOI]
14. D'Hondt E, Venetsanou F, Kambas A, Lenoir M. Motor competence levels in young children: a cross-cultural comparison between Belgium and Greece. J Mot Learn Dev. 2019;7(3):289–306. [DOI]
15. Seif AA. Andaze giri, sanjesh va arzeshyabi amoozeshi [Educational measurement, assessment and evaluation].Tehran: Doran Pub; 1383. [Persian]
16. Lucas BR, Latimer J, Doney R, Ferreira ML, Adams R, Hawkes G, et al. The Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Short Form is reliable in children living in remote Australian Aboriginal communities. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13(1):135. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb