Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 98 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.GUMS..REC.1400.083

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Bahramabadian F, Mojtabaie M, Sabet M. Comparing the Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment-Based Therapy and Schema Therapy on the Anxiety and Reduction of Impulsivity in Flagrant Addicts. MEJDS 2022; 12 :98-98
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2671-en.html
1- Department of Clinical Psychology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University
2- Department of Psychology, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University
Abstract:   (796 Views)

Background and Objectives: Addiction to drugs and its quitting are always a big concern for people addicted to drugs and their families. Drug addiction is a chronic, progressive, and recurrent disease that includes a set of cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and physiological symptoms, indicating that a drug addict continues to use drugs despite being aware of the consequences. People with substance abuse are twice as likely as normal people to have mood disorders, and anxiety is the most common mood disorder in these people. Anxiety is a warning sign that warns of impending danger and prepares a person to deal with a threat. One of the known mechanisms that affects people's tendency to use and dependence on drugs is impulsivity. Impulsivity includes a wide range of behavioral and cognitive tendencies such as difficulty in delaying or inhibiting the voluntary response, short response threshold, defect in delaying pleasure, and difficulty in paying attention. In this regard, the present study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment–based therapy and schema therapy on reducing anxiety and impulsivity in addicts.
Methods: This study is quasi–experimental with a pretest–posttest and a two–month follow–up design with a control group. The statistical population of the study consisted of all male addicts of Article 16 (The anti–narcotics law means the compulsory treatment of drug addicts) who are kept in government centers of Guilan Province, Iran for one to three months for treatment from 2020 to 2021 by order of a judicial official. The research sample consisted of 45 male addicts who were selected by purposive sampling method. The inclusion criteria were as follows: dominant and simultaneous use of heroin and glass, length of stay of three months, not being treated with psychological intervention and being treated with MMT (Methadone Maintenance Treatment). Then, they were randomly divided into three groups based on acceptance and commitment therapy, schema therapy, and control group. The exclusion criteria were as follows: having psychotic disorders, staying less than 3 months in the center, absence of more than two sessions, and unwillingness to continue participating in the study. Fifteen people were counted for each group. Beck Anxiety Inventory–II (Beck et al., 1996) and Barratt Impulsivity Scale (Barratt et al., 1997) were administered at the pretest, posttest, and follow–up stages for three groups. The first experimental group received eight 60–min sessions of acceptance and commitment treatment. For the second group, eight 60–minute sessions of group schema therapy intervention were presented. At the end of the training sessions, the tests were repeated for all three groups, and after two months of posttest, the follow–up test was performed. To statistically analyze the data, descriptive and inferential statistics were used. Mean and standard deviation were used for descriptive analysis of data, and analysis of variance with repeated measures and Bonferroni's post hoc test were used for inferential statistics in SPSS version 22. The significance level of the tests was considered to be 0.05.
Results: The results showed that the change in the three stages of pretest, posttest, and follow–up was significant regardless of the group factor for impulsivity and anxiety variables (p<0.001). The three groups had significant differences in impulsivity and anxiety variables (p<0.001). Also, there was a significant difference between the average scores of the experimental groups and the control group in the dependent variables of impulsivity and anxiety (p<0.001). However, no significant difference was observed between the average scores of impulsivity and anxiety in the two experimental groups (p=0.195 and p=0.999, respectively). Based on the average scores, the effectiveness of these treatments has been stable over two months.
Conclusion: According to study findings, acceptance and commitment–based and schema therapies are effective in reducing impulsivity and anxiety in addicts, and there was no difference between the effectiveness of the two treatments.

Full-Text [PDF 774 kb]   (332 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Mohagheghi H, Kharghani P. The effect of schema therapy on anxiety, depression, and early maladaptive schemas in individuals with substance use disorder. Research on Addiction. 2021;15(60):299–324. [Persian] [DOI]
2. Pournaghash Tehrani SS, Malekahmad M, Gholamali Lavasani M. Assessment of cognitive emotional dementions of personality and compaparison of psychological of prfile of individual with methamphetamine induce psychosis with normal subjects. Journal Of Psychological Science. 2021;20(100):533–6. [Persian] [Article]
3. Weinberg A, Kotov R, Proudfit GH. Neural indicators of error processing in generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and major depressive disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 2015;124(1):172–85. [DOI]
4. Boothby CA, Kim HS, Romanow NK, Hodgins DC, McGrath DS. Assessing the role of impulsivity in smoking & non-smoking disordered gamblers. Addict Behav. 2017;70:35–41. [DOI]
5. Baruch DE, Kanter JW, Busch AM, Juskiewicz KL. Enhancing the therapy relationship in acceptance and commitment therapy for psychotic symptoms. Clinical Case Studies. 2009;8(3):241–57. [DOI]
6. Viskovich S, Pakenham KI. Randomized controlled trial of a web‐based acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) program to promote mental health in university students. J Clin Psychol. 2020;76(6):929–51. [DOI]
7. McClure JB, Bricker J, Mull K, Heffner JL. Comparative effectiveness of group-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy versus cognitive behavioral therapy for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020;22(3):354–62. [DOI]
8. Sloshower J, Guss J, Krause R, Wallace RM, Williams MT, Reed S, et al. Psilocybin-assisted therapy of major depressive disorder using acceptance and commitment therapy as a therapeutic frame. J Contextual Behav Sci. 2020;15:12–9. [DOI]
9. Al-Sadi AM, Al-Oweisi FA, Edwards SG, Al-Nadabi H, Al-Fahdi AM. Genetic analysis reveals diversity and genetic relationship among Trichoderma isolates from potting media, cultivated soil and uncultivated soil. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15(1):147. [DOI]
10. Young JE, Klosko JS, Weishaar ME. Schema therapy: a practitioner’s guide. New York: The Guilford Press; 2003.
11. Idrissi SW, Ghailan T, Ahami A, Azzaoui FZ, Karjouh K, Mammad K. Measurement of early maladaptive schemas in heroin addicts treated with methadone in north of Morocco. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2018;8(3):185–96. [DOI]
12. Tapia G, Perez-Dandieu B, Lenoir H, Othily E, Gray M, Delile JM. Treating addiction with schema therapy and EMDR in women with co-occurring SUD and PTSD: a pilot study. J Subst Use. 2018;23(2):199–205. [DOI]
13. Nikpour F, Khalatbari J, Rezaei O, Jomehri F. The comparing effectivness of schema therapy and acceptance/commitment therapy on forgiveness among divorced women. Journal of Psychological Science. 2021;20(100):597–607. [Persian] [Article]
14. Sarmad Z, Bazargan A, Hejazi E. Ravesh haye tahghigh dar oloume raftari [Research methods in behavioral sciences]. Tehran: Agah Pub; 2015. [Persian]
15. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. BDI-II: Beck Depression Inventory Manual. Second edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1996.
16. Barratt ES, Stanford MS, Kent TA, Alan F. Neuropsychological and cognitive psychophysiological substrates of impulsive aggression. Biol Psychiatry. 1997;41(10):1045–61. [DOI]
17. Beck AT, Clark DA. An information processing model of anxiety: automatic and strategic processes. Behav Res Ther. 1997;35(1):49–58. [DOI]
18. Rafiei M, Seifi A. An investigation into the reliability and validity of Beck Anxiety Inventory among the university students. Thoughts & Behavior in Clinical Psychology. 2013;7(27):43–50. [Persian] [Article]
19. Akhavan Sh, Sajjadian I. Effectiveness of dialectical behavior therapy on emotional instability and impulsivity in bipolar patients. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2016;8(3):11–24. [Persian] [Article]
20. Peterson BD, Eifert GH, Feingold T, Davidson S. Using acceptance and commitment therapy to treat distressed couples: a case study with two couples. Cogn Behav Pract. 2009;16(4):430–42. [DOI]
21. Arjmandghujur K, Eghbali A. A comparing of two schema therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) attitudes effectiveness on early maladaptive schema in Metamphetamine addicts. Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi. 2018;7:151–78. [Persian] [Article]
22. Hemmat A, Mohammadi Bytamar J, Pirzeh R, Dadashi M. The effectiveness of group therapy based on acceptance and commitment to reduce obsessive-compulsive use of substance, anxiety and depression of addicts under methadone treatment. J Adv Med Biomed Res. 2018;26(117):109–25. [Persian] [Article]
23. Ahmad Sermori P, Mardani Karani J, Nazari Sarmazeh F, Sayyadi Shahraki Z, Omidian Dehkordi M. The effectiveness of admission and commitment group therapy on decreasing impulsivity and high risk behaviors of secondary school students. Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi. 2020;8(12):21–30. [Persian] [Article]
24. Herts KL, Evans S. Schema therapy for chronic depression associated with childhood trauma: a case study. Clinical Case Studies. 2021;20(1):22–38. [DOI]
25. Forman EM, Herbert JD. New directions in cognitive behavior therapy: acceptance-based therapies. In: O'Donohue WT, Fisher JE; editors. General principles and empirically supported techniques of cognitive behavior therapy. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2009.
26. Pourfarahani M, Ahmad Barabadi H, Heydarnia A. The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment group therapy in the social anxiety of adolescent orphan girls. Quarterly Journal of Social Work. 2019;8(4):5–13. [Persian] [Article]
27. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy: the process and practice of mindful change. Second edition. New York, London: The Guilford Press; 2012.
28. Nakhaee Shamahmood AA, Arab A, Farnam A. The effectiveness of group schema therapy on early maladaptive schema of traditional and industrial addicts under methadone treatment. The Journal Of Psychological Science. 2020;18(82):1187–97. [Persian] [Article]
29. Khosravani V, Mehdizadeh A, Dortaj A, Alvani A, Amirinezhad A. Early maladaptive schemas, behavioral inhibition/approach systems, and defense styles in the abusers of opiate, stimulant, and cannabis drugs and healthy subjects. J Subst Use. 2017;22(3):317–23. [DOI]
30. Daneshmandi S, Izadikhah Z, Wilson LA, Forooshani S. Emotional schema therapy improves emotion regulation in individuals with a history of child abuse and neglect. J Cogn Ther. 2019;12(1):5–15. [DOI]
31. Hajipoor H, Bayazi MH, Nejat H. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Schema Group Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Group Therapy on Substance Abusers’ Temptation and Impulsivity. Research in Clinical Psychology and Counseling. 2020;10(1):39–55. [Persian] [Article]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb