Volume 13 - Articles-1402                   MEJDS (2023) 13: 75 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abdolmaleki H, Asaseh M, Azizi M P, Hasanzadeh S. Investigating the Effect of Family-Centered Multisensory Program on Reading Skills and Its Components in 8- to 9-Year-Old Students with Special Learning Disability. MEJDS 2023; 13 :75-75
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2734-en.html
1- PhD Student in Psychology and Education of Exceptional Children, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences, Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3- Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (1035 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Dyslexia is one of the most controversial problems of students with specific learning disability. In dyslexia, children use decoding words and try to generalize, i.e., read new words not previously seen. Reading disorder should be considered one of the most essential factors of school dropout, academic failure, and other psychological consequences among students. Therefore, it is imperative to use effective methods for reading disorders. Multisensory methods are among the effective methods for improving reading disorders based on family–centered education—the importance of family–centered intervention results from the direct family relationship with the disordered child. The present study investigates the effectiveness of the family–centered multisensory program on reading skills and its components in 8– to 9–year–old students with specific learning disabilities.
Methods: The present study adopted a quasi–experimental approach with a pretest–posttest design with a control group. The statistical population included all students referring to two educational centers and part of special problems in Qorveh City, Iran. The research sample included 28 volunteer students with reading disorders, selected by an accessible sampling. Then, they were divided into two groups, experimental and control (14 people in each group). The inclusion criteria were students studying in the second grade of elementary school, not taking drugs in the field of psychological problems, not undergoing psychological treatment, and having parental consent. Family–centered multisensory intervention program was performed in 16 informative sessions for parents of the experimental group. The study data were collected using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–the Fourth Edition (WISC–IV) (Wechsler, 2003) and the Reading and Dyslexia Test (NEMA) (Kormi Nouri & Moradi, 2005). To analyze the data, descriptive (frequency distribution table, mean, and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (univariate covariance analysis test) were used at a significance level of 0.05 by SPSS version 21 software.
Results: The results showed that the family–centered multisensory program training led to a significant difference between the experimental and control groups in the reading variable and its components (reading, reading words, word chain, rhyme test, naming pictures, comprehending text, comprehending words, eliminating sounds, reading non–words and pseudowords, letter signs test and category signs test) (p<0.001). Also, the effect of family–centered multisensory program training on the reading variable was found to be 0.407.
Conclusion: Based on the findings, a family–centered multisensory intervention program can reduce the effects of the reading disorder and eliminate the consequences of dyslexia. It is also effective for solving reading disorders and improving reading and its components in second–grade students.

Full-Text [PDF 577 kb]   (295 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Rehabilitation

References
1. Orton ST. Reading, writing and speech problems in children. New York: W W Norton & Co; 1937.
2. Snowling MJ. Dyslexia: A very short introduction. 1st ed. Oxford University Press; 2019. [DOI]
3. Pennington BF, Bishop DVM. Relations among speech, language, and reading disorders. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:283–306. [DOI]
4. Nation K, Snowling MJ. Semantic processing and the development of word-recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language. 1998;39(1):85–101. [DOI]
5. Perry C, Zorzi M, Ziegler JC. Understanding dyslexia through personalized large-scale computational models. Psychol Sci. 2019;30(3):386–95. [DOI]
6. Angold A, Costello EJ, Erkanli A. Comorbidity. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1999;40(1):57–87.
7. Moll K, Snowling MJ, Hulme C. Introduction to the special issue “comorbidities between reading disorders and other developmental disorders.” Scientific Studies of Reading. 2020;24(1):1–6. [DOI]
8. Steele MM. Making the case for early identification and intervention for young children at risk for learning disabilities. Early Childhood Education Journal. 2004;32(2):75–9. [DOI]
9. Lammi BM, Law M. The effects of family-centred functional therapy on the occupational performance of children with cerebral palsy. Can J Occup Ther. 2003;70(5):285–97. [DOI]
10. Rosenbaum P, King S, Law M, King G, Evans J. Family–centred service. Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics. 1998;18(1):1–20. [DOI]
11. Dunst CJ. Family–centered practices: Birth through high school. J Spec Educ. 2002;36(3):141–9. [DOI]
12. Wechsler D. Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. Psychological Corporation; 1974.
13. Kormi-Nouri R, Moradi AR. Reading and Dyslexia Test (NEMA). Tehran: Jahade Daneshgahi Publications; 2005. [Persian]
14. Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. 8th ed. London ; New York: Routledge; 2018.
15. Sadeghi A, Rabiee M, Abedi MR. Validation and reliability of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–IV. Developmental Pscychology. 2011;7(28):377–86. [Persian]
16. Faramarzi S, Mohamadzade A. Effectiveness of response to intervention – based targeted reading intervention on comprehension in students with specific learning disability. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals. 2017;7(27):185–208. [Persian] [DOI]
17. Afrooz GA, Kamkari K, Shokrzadeh S,Hellat A. Rahnamaye ejra, nomregozari va tafsir meghyashaye hoosh Wechsler koodakan– noskhe 4om [Guide to implementation, scoring and interpretation of Wechsler intelligence scales for children – 4th ed]. Tehran: Elm Ostadan; 2014. [Persian]
18. Ghasemi S, Arjmandnia AA, Gholamali Lavasani M. Designing family–based cognitive rehabilitation package and evaluating its effectiveness on executive functions of dyslexic students. Empowering Exceptional Children. 2019;10(2):200–15. [Persian] [DOI]
19. Purkayastha S, Nehete N, Purkayastha J. Dyscover – an Orton–Gillingham approach inspired multi–sensory learning application for dyslexic children. In: 2012 World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies [Internet]. Trivandrum, India: IEEE: 2012. pp: 685–90. [DOI]
20. Sapi’ee MR, Tan KH. Multisensory learning approach: Impacts on phonological awareness among young ESL learners in a rural setting. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 2020;8(12):6692–705. [DOI]
21. Sisson D, Sisson B. Targeted reading interventions for the common core: Grades K 3: Classroom–tested lessons that help struggling students meet the rigors of the standards. Scholastic Teaching Resources; 2014.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb