Determining the Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioral Couple Therapy on Marital Conflict, Marital Boredom, and Emotional Self-regulation of Couples at Risk of Divorce in Baneh City, Iran

Adabi, Hiwa; Azmoudeh, Masoumeh; Mesrabadi, Javad; Hosseini Nasab, Seyed Davood

Volume 12 - Articles-1401 MEJDS (2022) 12: 207 | Back to browse issues page

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Adabi H, Azmoudeh M, Mesrabadi J, Hosseini Nasab S D. Determining the Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioral Couple Therapy on Marital Conflict, Marital Boredom, and Emotional Self-regulation of Couples at Risk of Divorce in Baneh City, Iran. MEJDS 2022; 12 :207-207
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2777-en.html

Determining the Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioral Couple Therapy on Marital Conflict, Marital Boredom, and Emotional Self-regulation of Couples at Risk of Divorce in Baneh City, Iran

Hiwa Adabi¹

, Masoumeh Azmoudeh ^*

², Javad Mesrabadi³

, Seyed Davood Hosseini Nasab⁴

1- PhD Student, Department of Psychology, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
3- Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Tabriz Branch, Shahid Madani University of Azerbaijan, Tabriz, Iran
4- Professor, Department of Psychology, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract: (1125 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: The increased marital dissatisfaction has raised the tendency towards divorce. Marital conflicts and lack of ability to resolve conflicts are among the marital disabilities and abnormalities that cause mental problems and indifference and divorced couples. Couples need emotion regulation and management to communicate intimately. Emotional skills increase the ability to bear the psychological pressures of life and solve daily problems. Conflicts and lack of emotion regulation in couples lead to marital boredom. Marital boredom is a painful physical, emotional, and psychological condition that affects people who expect a romantic relationship from their marriage. The treatment of marital conflicts is important for the family. The present study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of cognitive–behavioral couple therapy on marital conflicts, marital boredom, and emotional self–regulation of couples at risk of divorce in Baneh City, Iran.
Methods: This was a quasi–experimental study with a pretest–posttest and follow–up design with a control group. The study’s statistical population included all couples referred to the Baneh Dispute Resolution Council in the spring of 2021. Among these couples, 30 couples were randomly selected and divided into experimental and control groups. The quasi–experimental design was used for this research with a control group and measurement of dependent variables in four time periods: pretest, posttest, one–month follow–up, and three–month follow–up. The inclusion criteria were as follows: husband or wife with at least fifth–grade education, divorce file in court, living in an environment during couple therapy interventions, and willingness to cooperate to receive couples therapy intervention. The exclusion criteria were not following the group rules stated in the first session and absenting more than one session in the intervention sessions. Couples in both groups answered the Marital Burnout Scale (Pines, 1996), Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (Gratz & Roemer, 2004), and Marital Conflicts Questionnaire (Sanaei Zaker & Barati, 1996) in four stages of assessment (pretest, posttest, one–month follow–up, and three–month follow–up). The cognitive–behavioral couple therapy protocol was developed by Azimifar (2014) and based on the treatment plan of McKay et al. (2006) and Dattilio (2010). The cognitive–behavioral couple therapy protocol consisted of 10 treatment sessions (each session 60 to 90 minutes). The content of the sessions was based on a cognitive–behavioral approach, in a step–by–step manner and with a weekly session for the participants. In each meeting, first, the purpose of the meeting, then the issues related to that meeting, were discussed and the members discussed and exchanged views. At the end of each session, the material was summarized and an assignment was presented for the next session. Descriptive statistics methods including mean, standard deviation and frequency distribution were used to summarize the data. Analysis of variance with repeated measurements, the Chi–square test and the Bonferroni post hoc test were used to analyze the data. Analysis was done by SPSS software version 23.
Results: Results showed that the group effect (p<0.001), the time effect (p<0.001), and the interaction effect of time and group (p<0.001) on the variables of marital boredom, marital conflicts, and emotional self–regulation were significant. The results indicated a significant difference between the averages of the pretest with the posttest, and between the averages of the pretest with one–month and three–month follow–ups for the variables of marital boredom (p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively), marital conflicts (p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively), and emotional self–regulation (p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively). Also, the difference between the averages of the one–month follow–up stages and the three–month follow–up for the variables of marital boredom (p=0.024), marital conflicts (p<0.001) and emotional self–regulation (p<0.001) were found to be significant. The comparison of the average scores of the posttest and follow–up stages for the mentioned variables showed that the intervention in the follow–up stages did not continue to be effective.
Conclusion: Based on the findings of the research, group cognitive–behavioral couple therapy reduces marital conflicts, marital boredom, and emotional self–regulation, and counselors and psychotherapists should use this intervention in solving the problems of couples facing divorce.

Keywords: Cognitive–Behavioral couples therapy, Couples at risk of divorce, Marital conflicts, Marital boredom, Emotional self–regulation

Full-Text [PDF 778 kb] (514 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References

1. Day RD. Introduction to family processes. 5th edition. London: Routledge; 2002. [DOI]

2. Panahi E, Fatehi Zadeh M. Studying the relationship between factors of psychological capital and marital life quality among couples of Isfahan. Quarterly Journal of Woman & Society. 2015;6(23):41–58. [Persian] [Article]

3. Amato PR. Children of divorce in the 1990s: an update of the Amato and Keith (1991) meta-analysis. J Fam Psychol. 2001;15(3):355–70. [DOI]

4. Zare Baghbidi M, Etemadifard A. Determining the mediating role of communication skills in the relationship between alexithymia and marital burnout of divorce client couples in Yazd. Quarterly Social Psychology Research. 2020;10(38):135–50. [Persian] [Article]

5. Navabinejad Sh. Marriage counseling and family therapy. Tehran: Parents-Teachers Association; 2017. [Persian]

6. Mansour L, Adibrad N. Moghayeseye beyn ta’aroz zanashooei va ab’aade aan dar moraje’eine zan markaz khadamat moshaverei daneshgah shahid beheshti va zanan aadi [The comparison between marital conflict and its dimensions in women who were referred as clients to counseling center with ordinary women]. Couseling Research and Development. 2004;3(11):47–64. [Persian]

7. Dillon HN. Family violence and divorce: effects on marriage expectations [Thesis for MSc]. East Tennessee State University; 2005.

8. Harmon DK. Black men and marriage: the impact of spirituality, religiosity, and marital commitment on marital satisfaction [PhD dissertation]. [Tuscaloosa, Alabama]: The University of Alabama; 2005.

9. Papp LM. Topics of marital conflict in the everyday lives of empty nest couples and their implications for conflict resolution. J Couple Relatsh Ther. 2018;17(1):7–24. [DOI]

10. RyuSeokjin, cho-hyun-ju. The effect of marital conflict on marital satisfaction: the mediating effect of dysfunctional communication behavior and moderating effect of self-compassion. Korean Journal of Health Psychology. 2015;20(1):213–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2015.20.1.012 [DOI]

11. Weinberger MI, Hofstein Y, Whitbourne SK. Intimacy in young adulthood as a predictor of divorce in midlife. Personal Relationships. 2008;15(4):551–7. [DOI]

12. Dunham SM. Emotional skillfulness in African American marriage: intimate safety as a mediator of the relationship between emotional skillfulness and marital satisfaction [PhD dissertation]. [Akron, Ohio]: University of Akron; 2008.

13. Ben‐Ari A, Lavee Y. Ambivalence over emotional expressiveness in intimate relationships: a shift from an individual characteristic to dyadic attribute. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2011;81(2):277–84. [DOI]

14. Lopes PN, Salovey P, Côté S, Beers M. Emotion regulation abilities and the quality of social interaction. Emotion. 2005;5(1):113–8. [DOI]

15. Mirgain SA, Cordova JV. Emotion skills and marital health: the association between observed and self–reported emotion skills, intimacy, and marital satisfaction. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2007;26(9):983–1009. [DOI]

16. Gottman J, Gottman J. The natural principles of love. J Fam Theory Rev. 2017;9(1):7–26. [DOI]

17. Gharagozloo N, Moradhaseli M, Atadokht A. Compering the effectiveness of face to face and virtual cognitive-behavioral couples therapy on the post-traumatic stress disorder in extra-marital relations. Journal of Counseling Research. 2018;17(65):187–210. [Persian] [Article]

18. Zabihi Vali Abad F, Akbari Amarghan H, Khakpour M, Meherafarid M, Kazemi G. The effects of group cognitive behavioral therapy on hardiness among female victims of domestic violence. Quarterly Journal of Woaen & Society. 2017;8(30):15–34. [Persian] [Article]

19. Petersen MGF, Zamora JC, Fermann IL, Crestani PL, Habigzang LF. Cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy for women experiencing domestic violence: a systematic review. Clinical Psychology. 2019;31(1):145–65.

20. Habigzang LF, Schneider JA, Frizzo RP, Freitas CPP de. Evaluation of the impact of a cognitive-behavioral intervention for women in domestic violence situations in Brazil. Univ Psychol. 2018;17(3):1–11. [DOI]

21. Dattilio FM. Cognitive-behavioral therapy with couples and families: a comprehensive guide for clinician. New York: Guilford Press; 2009.

22. Lan J, Sher TG. Cognitive-behavioral family therapy. In: Lebow JL, Chambers AL, Breunlin DC; editors. Encyclopedia of couple and family therapy. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. [DOI]

23. Parseh M, Naderi F, Mehrabizade Honarmand M. Efficacy of cognitive– behavioral family therapy on marital conflicts and sexual satisfaction in couples referred to psychological centers. Achievements of Clinical Psychology. 2015;1(1):125–48. [Persian] [Article]

24. Khodayari Fard M, Alavinezhad S, Sajjadi Anari S, Zandi S. Efficacy of family therapy combined with CBT techniques on treatment of sexual variety seeking. Rooyesh. 2017;5(4):85–116. [Persian] [Article]

25. Askari I. Early maladaptive schemas and cognitive-behavioral aspect of anger: schema model perspective. J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther. 2019;37(3):262–83. [DOI]

26. Senkans S, McEwan TE, Ogloff JRP. Conceptualising intimate partner violence perpetrators’ cognition as aggressive relational schemas. Aggress Violent Behav. 2020;55:101456. [DOI]

27. Saeidnia Z, Makvandi B. Schema therapy efficacy training on early maladaptive schemas and conflict resolution patterns in married women referring to counseling centers. Scientific Research Quarterly of Woman and Culture. 2018;10(37):99–113. [Persian]

28. Delavar A. Educational and psychological research. Tehran: Virayesh Pub; 2006. [Persian]

29. Pines AM. Couple burnout: causes and cures. New York: Routledge; 1996.

30. Pines AM, Nunes R. the relationship between career and couple burnout: implications for career and couple counseling. J Employ Couns. 2003;40(2):50–64. [DOI]

31. Navidi F. Barrasi va moghayeseye delzadegi zanashooei ba avamele jjav sazemani dar karkonan edarat amoozesh o parvaresh va parastaran bimarestan haye shahre tehran dar sal 1384 [Study and comparison of the relationship between marital burnout and organizational climate factors in employees of education departments and nurses in Tehran hospitals in 2004] [Thesis for MSc]. [Tehran, Iran]: Shahid Beheshti University; 2004. [Persian]

32. Soodani M, Dehghani M, Dehghanizadeh Z. The effectiveness of transactional analysis training on couple’s burnout and quality of couple’s life in. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2013;3(2):159–81. [Persian] [Article]

33. Sanai Zaker B. Family and marriage scales. Tehran: Besat Pub; 2017. [Persian]

34. Khazaei M. Barrasi rabeteye beyne olguhaye ertebati va ta'arozate zanashuyi daneshjuyane daneshgahe Tehran [Investigating the relationship between communication patterns and marital conflicts of Tehran University students] [Thesis for MSc]. [Tehran, Iran]: Khatam University; 2004. [Persian].

35. Dehghan F. Moghayeseye ta’arozate zanashooei zanan motaghazi talagh ba zanan moraje konande baraye moshavere zanashooei gheyre motaghazi talagh [Comparison of marital conflicts of women applying for divorce with women referring for marriage counseling non-divorce applicants] [Thesis for MSc]. [Tehran, Iran]: Tarbiat Moallem University; 2004. [Persian]

36. Gratz KL, Roemer L. Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2004;26(1):41–54. [DOI]

37. Asgari P, Pasha Gh, Aminian M. Rabeteye tanzime hayajani feshar zaha ye ravani zendegi va tasvir az badan ba ekhtelalat khordan dar zanan [Relationship between emotion regulation, mental stresses and body image with eating disorders of women]. Andishe va Raftar. 2009;4(13):65–78. [Persian]

38. Azimifar Sh. Moghayese asarbakhshiye zojdarmnai shenakhti-raftari va darmna mobtani bar paziresh va ta'hod bar afzayesh shadiye zanashuyi zojeyne narazi shahre Isfahan: yek pazhuhesh mored monfared [Comparing the effects of cognitive-behavioral couple therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy on marital happiness of dissatisfied couples in isfahan: a single subject research] [Thesis for MSc]. [Isfahan, Iran]: Isfahan University; 2014. [Persian]

39. McKay M, Fanning P, Paleg K. Couple skills: making your relationship work. New Harbinger Publications; 2006.

40. Dattilio FM. Zoj darmani va khanevade darmani shenakhti-raftari: rahanamaei jame baraye moshaveran va darmangaran balini [Cognitive-behavioral couple therapy and family therapy book: a comprehensive guide for clinical counselors and therapists]. Esmaeili M, Fathi E, Gorji Z, Soleimani M. (Persian Translator). Tehran: Allameh Tabatabai University Pub; 2010.

41. Pirfalak M, Sodani M, Shafiabadi A. The efficacy of group cognitive-behavioral couple’s therapy (gcbct) on the decrease of couple burnout. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2014;4(2):247–69. [Persian] [Article]

42. Karimi B, Khalatbari J. The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy on couple’s burnout, marital adjustment and intimacy. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2017;8(1):65–74. [Persian] [Article]

43. Sodani M, Sharyari Y, Shafiabadi A. Asar bakhshi amoozesh khanevade darmani sakhti be shiveye gorouhi bar kaheshe ta’arozat zanashooei zojeyn erjaei be sho’ab shoraye hall ekhtelaf shahrestan Baghmalek [A study of the effect of structural family therapy through group methods in reducing marital conflicts among couples referred to council for disagreement solution (CDS) in Baghmalek]. Journal of Social Psychology. 2010;4(12):7–25 .[Persian]

44. Goudarzi M, Shiri F, Mahmoudi B. Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral family therapy on parent-child conflicts and marital conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2019;12(4):531–51. [Persian] [Article]

45. Stinson MA, Bermúdez JM, Gale J, Lewis D, Meyer AS, Templeton GB. Marital satisfaction, conflict resolution styles, and religious attendance among latino couples: using the actor–partner interdependence model. The Family Journal. 2017;25(3):215–23. [DOI]

46. Grieger R. The couples therapy companion: a cognitive behavior workbook. First edition. Routledge; 2015. [DOI]

47. Boisvert MM, Wright J, Tremblay N, McDuff P. Couples’ reports of relationship problems in a naturalistic therapy setting. The Family Journal. 2011;19(4):362–8. [DOI]

48. Fruzzetti A, Linehan MM. The high-conflict couple: a dialectical behavior therapy guide to finding peace, intimacy, & validation. First edition. New Harbinger Publications; 2006.

49. Den S. The effect of cognitive behavioral group therapy on the resilience and social adjustment of divorced woman. J Pers Assess. 2013;63(2):262–74.

50. Shooshtari A, Rezaee A, Taheri A. The effectiveness of cognitivebehavioral group therapy on divorced women’s emotional regulation, meta-cognitive beliefs, and rumination. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health. 2016;18(6):321–8. [Persian] [Article]

51. Levinsoon J. The effect of cognitive behavioral group therapy on the rogulation and self-efficiency of the divorcee. J Educ Gift. 2014;21:228–309.