Volume 14 - Articles-1403                   MEJDS (2024) 14: 136 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Salehi H R, Neshat-Doost H T, Faramarzi S. Determining the Effectiveness of a Native Pattern of Perceptual Enrichment on Improving Reading Ability in Dyslexic Children Studying in Third-Grade Primary School in Hamadan City, Iran. MEJDS 2024; 14 :136-136
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2896-en.html
1- PhD Student in Educational Psychology, Department of Psychology, College of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2- Professor, Department of Psychology, College of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
3- Associate Professor, Department of Psychology and Education of Children with Special Needs, College of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract:   (1148 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: The ability to read is one of the most vital skills in today's modern world. Disability in reading occurs when a person's reading skill or general reading ability is significantly less than expected concerning intellectual abilities. It is accepted that other disabling conditions with environmental effects did not play a role. Many researchers believe that although the brain and perceptual system are not damaged in children with reading disorders, they function differently than typical children. Some researchers report a significant weakness in the visual motor perception of these children compared to normal children. This problem occurs in some dyslexic students in the form that they read a sentence but cannot understand its meaning or cannot understand written signs. So, the present study aims to determine the effectiveness of the native pattern of perceptual enrichment in improving the reading ability of dyslexic children in the third grade of elementary school studying in Hamedan City, Iran.
Methods: The research method was quasi–experimental with a pretest–posttest design and a control group. This study's population comprises all third–grade students with dyslexia studying in Hamadan in the academic year 2020–2021. Of them, 50 people were selected by purposive methods and randomly divided into experimental and control groups. In this study, the perceptual enrichment training package was considered an independent variable, and the reading ability of children with dyslexia was considered a dependent variable. The perceptual enrichment training package intervention for the experimental group was implemented in a group setting. Information about the type of treatment, the participant's attendance at the session, and the number and time of the sessions were provided to the students and their parents. Confidentiality was explained as a basic principle in the treatment, and finally, subjects who expressed their consent to participate in the groups were selected. The conditions for the subjects to enter the study were as follows: diagnosis of dyslexia by clinical psychologists of the centers based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (2), education in the third grade of elementary school, male gender, no parallel treatment process, parental consent for the student to participate in the study, and student consent for participation in the study. The conditions for subjects to withdraw from the study were failure to regularly attend treatment sessions, complete homework assignments, and complete the questionnaires in the pretest and posttest. The intervention was performed in 21 sessions for the experimental group. The control group did not undergo a parallel treatment process during the study, with the children's and parents' agreement. The Reading and Dyslexia Test (NEMA) (Karami Nouri et al., 2006) was used in the pretest and posttest in the experimental and control groups. Multivariate analysis of covariance was used in SPSS version 21 software to analyze the data. The significance level of statistical tests was set at 0.05.
Results: The results showed that the native pattern of perceptual enrichment significantly improved reading ability in dyslexic children (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Based on the above findings, perceptual enrichment treatment has a significant effect on the reading ability of dyslexic students and has an effect on all 25 students, so its application can be fruitful. Therefore, it is recommended that perceptual enrichment therapy be integrated or used in treatment programs for people with dyslexia.

Full-Text [PDF 264 kb]   (129 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Rehabilitation

References
1. Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, Kaplan HI, Sadock BJ. Kaplan & Sadock's concise textbook of child and adolescent psychiatry. Philadelphia, Pa.: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. pp:1320–5.
2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM–5. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2015. pp:65–7.
3. Salehi H. Develop a native model of perceptual enrichment and compare its effectiveness with Fernald's method in the field of reading ability, academic self–efficacy and internal evaluation of dyslexic children [Ph.D. thesis]. [Isfahan, Iran]: Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch; 2019. [Persian]
4. Heidari K, Faramarzi S, Abedi A, Ghamarani A. Designing the comprehensive diagnostic test of dyslexia (CDTD) and investigating its validity and reliability for primary school students of Isfahan in 2015–2016. Journal of Paramedical Sciences & Rehabilitation. 2019;8(2):17–28. [Persian] [DOI]
5. Heidari T, Sfahmive A, Abedi A, Bahramipoor M. The comparison of Fernald and Davis Method on reading performance in the dyslexic student. Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology. 2012;4(2):34–42. [Persian] [Article]
6. Maleki S, Ahmadi S. Checking the reading literacy rates of the fourth grade of elementary students of Shahriyar city and the comparison with the average student performance of the fourth grade of elementary students in the whole country. Research in Curriculum Planning. 2013;5(39):69–79. [Persian] [Article]
7. Same Siahkalroodi L, Alizadeh H, Kooshesh M. The impact of visual perception skills training on reading performance in students with dyslexia. Advances in Cognitive Science. 2009;11(2):63–72. [Persian] [Article]
8. Ghesari M. Perceptual enrichment on improving reading performance in dyslexic male students in the second and third grades of elementary school [Thesis in M.A]. [Hamadan, Iran]: Hamadan University; 2015. [Persian]
9. Jalali D. The effect of cognitive–behavioral enrichment on the social fear of children 5 to 11 [dissertation]. [Mashhad]:Mashhad University; 2014.
10. Salehi HR, Neshat–Doost HT, Faramarzi S. The effectiveness of perceptual enrichment on self–efficacy in third grade primary school students: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences. 2020;16(1):253–61. [Persian] [Article]
11. Lerner JW, Johns B. Learning disabilities and related disabilities: strategies for success. 13th ed. Cengage Learning; 2014. pp:65–70.
12. Wang R, Chen L, Solheim I. A conceptual system architecture for motivation–enhanced learning for students with dyslexia. In: Proceedings of the 2017 1st International Conference on E–Education, E–Business and E–Technology [Internet]. Toronto, Canada: ACM; 2017 [cited 2023 Feb 13]. pp. 13–9. Available from: [DOI]
13. Farsi AR, Abdoli B, Kavyani M, Kavyani A. Effect of early perceptual–motor enrichment on later fine motor development process of infants. Journal of Modern Rehabilitation. 2012;6(3):50–6. [Persian] [Article]
14. Seyyed Sharbat M, Zarei HA, Hoseininasab SD. Comparative study of visual–spatial working memory perception in normal students and students with special learning disabilities. The Scientific Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2021;10(5):988–1001. [Persian] [DOI]
15. Siminghalam M, Alibakhshi H, Ahmadi Zadeh Z. An investigation of bilateral coordination of children with specific learning disorder. Journal of Paramedical Sciences & Rehabilitation. 2016;5(1):7–13. [Persian] [DOI]
16. Karami Nouri R, Moradi A, Akbari Zardkhane S. Study plan of reading and dyslexia in monolingual (Tehran) and bilingual (Tabrizi and Sanandji) primary school students. Curriculum Planning and Educational Innovations Research Institute, Organization for Educational Research and Planning, Ministry of Education; 2006. [Persian]
17. Moradi A, Hoseini M, Kormi Nouri R, Hassani J, Parhoon H. Reliability and validity of reading and dyslexia test (NEMA). Advances in Cognitive Science. 2016;18(1):22–34. [Persian] [Article]
18. Nasri S, Karimi Lichahi R. The comparison of the effectiveness of multi-sensory and perceptual-motor training method in improving reading skills dyslexic students. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2016;5(4):123–40. [Persian] [Article]
19. Soliman MS, Al-Madani FM. The effects of multisensory–based instruction combined with brain–compatible environment techniques on reading fluency and reading comprehension of fourth-grade students with dyslexia. Croatian Journal of Education. 2017;19(2):363–97. [DOI]
20. Ghasemi M, Tahayi AA, Jafari P. The auditory perception of students with reading problem and comparing them with their normal classmates. Empowering Exceptional Children. 2016;7(4):19–23. [Persian] [Article]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb