Volume 13 - Articles-1402                   MEJDS (2023) 13: 112 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Seifi M, Bazaroich Ghaderaf G. Comparing Parenting Styles and Self-efficacy Between Tajik Male and Female Teenagers. MEJDS 2023; 13 :112-112
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2931-en.html
1- PhD Student in Psychology, Sadriddin Aini University, Dushanbe, Tajikistan
2- Professor, University of Tajikistan Academy of Education, Dushanbe, Tajikistan
Abstract:   (836 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objective: Children will experience emotional and cognitive changes in different aspects when they mature into adolescence. During this period, growth and transformation occur in physical, cognitive, and social–emotional fields. Excluding the infancy period, the most extensive changes occur in adolescence. The beginning of adolescence is associated with puberty, containing physical, cognitive, social, and emotional development. During this period, significant and widespread changes occur in the self–concept of teenagers due to the experience of an identity crisis. Family and its status are the first and most crucial social system that effectively forms self–efficacy and self–esteem in their children. Many factors, including sociocultural factors, influence how families educate their teenagers and promote their self–efficacy. Parenting and its relationships are important because evidence shows that parents' interaction with their children plays a significant role in determining the children's self–efficacy. Children's psychological characteristics and gender also affect parents' interaction methods and parenting styles. Different parenting styles create different behaviors among children and teenagers. In other words, children's behavior is strongly influenced by the family's parenting styles. This research aimed to compare parenting styles and self–efficacy in male and female teenagers in Dushanbe, Tajikistan.
Methods: The research method was descriptive–analytical and of comparative causal type. The statistical population of the current study included all 10000 high school students studying in the city of Dushanbe, Tajikistan, in the academic year of 2010–2011. Of them, 300 eligible girls and boys were randomly selected by multi–stage cluster sampling method. In this way, 6 schools were randomly selected from secondary high schools in Dushanbe in the first stage. In the next stage, 3 secondary schools were randomly selected from each school. The inclusion criteria were as follows: growing up under a mother's guardian during childhood and adolescence, lacking physical disabilities and chronic diseases, and not taking drugs. The exclusion criterion was incomplete answering to the study questionnaires. The research tools were the Baumrind Parenting Styles Questionnaire (Baumrind, 1991) and the Self–efficacy Scale (Sherer et al.,1982). Data analysis was done using the t test comparing the averages of two independent groups at a significance level of 0.05.
Results: In the present study, the mean ± SD age of the study females was 16.50 ± 1.09, and that of the males was 16.48 ± 1.08 years. The results of the present study showed a significant difference between the two groups of males and females in the variables of self–efficacy (p=0.041) and authoritarian parenting style (p=0.048). Teenage females obtained a higher average score (66.40±10.70) in self–efficacy than males (61.31±15.97). Also, adolescent males received a higher average score (111.00±8.02) in authoritarian parenting style than females (127.54±5.84).
Conclusion: The results of the present study showed differences between the two groups of teenage females and males in Tajikistan in terms of perceived self–efficacy and parenting styles. The adolescent males reported a higher authoritarian parenting style. In general, authoritative parenting is characterized by high demands from parents and their inadequate responses. These parents do not see the need to provide a reason for their orders and emphasize their children's unconditional obedience and respect. Parents encourage girls to seek and maintain close relationships. On the other hand, boys' tendency to be independent in individual and interpersonal situations imposes a heavy burden on them and forces them to fight hard to get rid of their parents' domination. Such a struggle is considered disobedience by parents and sometimes forces them to be strict in interacting with boys, ultimately reducing the teenagers' self–efficacy. One of the effects of correct parenting roles and methods in the family is the opportunities provided for children to know their capabilities and talents and take steps toward self–efficacy. This issue makes their time and energy optimally spent on positive things. Dealing with positive things and feeling that parents always have a supportive role, in turn, makes children feel self–efficacy. Developing effective educational programs and counseling to the family to use the best parenting style to increase self–efficacy, especially in male adolescents, are suggested among families.

Full-Text [PDF 482 kb]   (257 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Keating DP I. Demidenko M, Kelly D. Cognitive and neurocognitive development in adolescence. In: Reference module in neuroscience and biobehavioral psychology. Elsevier; 2019. [DOI]
2. Page CE, Coutellier L. Adolescent stress disrupts the maturation of anxiety–related behaviors and alters the developmental trajectory of the prefrontal cortex in a sex– and age–specific manner. Neuroscience. 2018;390:265–77. [DOI]
3. Moghadam R, Tabibi J, Riahi, Hajinabi K. A comparative study of adolescent and youth health status: a systematic review. Journal of Health Promotion Management. 2019;8(6):67–75. [Persian] [Article]
4. Morelli V. Adolescent health screening: an update in the age of big data. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2019, pp: 1–5.
5. Latva R, Furmark C. Family support; international trends. In: Benson JB, editor. Encyclopedia of infant and early childhood development. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2020. pp: 603–12. [DOI]
6. Faramarzi S, Abedi MR, Karimi M. The relationship between coping styles and adolescents' depression. Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;3(2):17–26. [Persian] [Article]
7. Gorrese A, Ruggieri R. Peer attachment and self–esteem: a meta–analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences. 2013;55(5):559–68. [DOI]
8. Milioni M, Alessandri G, Eisenberg N, Castellani V, Zuffianò A, Vecchione M, et al. Reciprocal relations between emotional self–efficacy beliefs and ego–resiliency across time. J Pers. 2015;83(5):552–63. [DOI]
9. Bandura A. Self–efficacy: the exercise of control. New York, NY, US: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co; 1997.
10. Lv B, Zhou H, Liu C, Guo X, Liu J, Jiang K, et al. The relationship between parental involvement and children's self–efficacy profiles: a person–centered approach. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2018;27(11):3730–41. [DOI]
11. Albanese AM, Russo GR, Geller PA. The role of parental self–efficacy in parent and child well–being: a systematic review of associated outcomes. Child Care Health Dev. 2019;45(3):333–63.
12. Baumrind D. The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. The Journal of Early Adolescence. 1991;11(1):56–95. [DOI]
13. Turner EA, Chandler M, Heffer RW. The influence of parenting styles, achievement motivation, and self–efficacy on academic performance in college students. Journal of College Student Development. 2009;50(3):337–46. [DOI]
14. Firoozi MR, Mohamadi MN, Nikdel F. The predictive role of emotional intelligence and perceived parenting styles in happiness of students. Positive Psychology Research. 2017;2(4):39–50. [Persian] [DOI]
15. Malekzade L, Heidari M, Pakdaman S, Tahmassian K. The mediator relationship/effect of subsets of applied parenting styles and self–efficacy on psychological well–being in adolescents. Journal of Family Research. 2014;10(1):113–26. [Persian] [Article]
16. Tasker F. Same–sex parenting and child development: reviewing the contribution of parental gender. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2010;72(1):35–40. [DOI]
17. Taghiloo S. Study of adolescents perceived parenting styles based on their gender and age. Journal of Family Research. 2018;13(3):447–59. [Persian] [Article]
18. McKinney C, Milone MC, Renk K. Parenting and late adolescent emotional adjustment: mediating effects of discipline and gender. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2011;42(4):463–81. [DOI]
19. Someya T, Uehara T, Kadowaki M, Tang SW, Takahashi S. Effects of gender difference and birth order on perceived parenting styles, measured by the EMBU scale, in Japanese two–sibling subjects. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000;54(1):77–81. [DOI]
20. Usher EL, Morris DB. Self–efficacy. In: Friedman HS, Markey CH. Encyclopedia of mental health. 3rd ed. Oxford: Academic Press; 2023. pp: 117–24. [DOI]
21. Kang H. Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:17. [DOI]
22. Buri JR. Parental authority questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1991;57(1):110–9. [DOI]
23. Morowatisharifabad MA, Khankolabi M, Gerami MH, Fallahzade H, Mozaffari–khosravi H, Seadatee–Shamir A. Psychometric properties of the persian version of parenting style and dimensions questionnaire: application for children's health–related behaviors. International Journal of Pediatrics. 2016;4(9):3373–80. [Persian] [DOI]
24. Sherer M, Maddux JE, Mercandante B, Prentice–dunn S, Jacobs B, Rogers RW. The self–efficacy scale: construction and validation. Psychological Reports. 1982;51(2):663–71. [DOI]
25. Asgharnejad T, Ahmadi Dehghotboddini M, Farzad V, Khodapanahi MK. Psychometric properties of sherer's general self–efficacy scale. Journal of Psychology. 2006;10(3):262–74. [Persian]
26. Matejevic M, Jovanovic D, Ilic M. Patterns of family functioning and parenting style of adolescents with depressive reactions. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;185:234–9. [DOI]
27. Ghani FBA, Roeswardi SI, Aziz AA. Parenting styles and their relation to teenagers' personality profile in single mother families: a case study. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;114:766–70. [DOI]
28. Doustani S, Ghamarani A. Comparing the effectiveness of emotion socialization and parenting metaphors training for mothers on feeling of shame in children with internalized behavioral problems. Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences. 2021;11(2):27–42. [Persian] [DOI]
29. Amerian E, Nouhi S, Janbozorgi M. Evaluating the causal model of fathers' personality pattern and alexithymia in adolescent girls: the mediating role of dysfunctional parenting styles. Rooyesh–e–Ravanshenasi Journal. 2021;10(8):69–80. [Persian] [Article]
30. Borjali A, Talebi–Najafabadi S, Molamadkhani S, Farrokhi NA, Danesh E. Explaining the relationship between perceived parenting styles and obsessive–compulsive symptoms: the mediation role of self–efficacy and thought fusion. Thoughts and Behavior in Clinical Psychology. 2019;13(47):67–76. [Persian] [Article]
31. Wei C, Kendall PC. Parental involvement: contribution to childhood anxiety and its treatment. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2014;17(4):319–39. [DOI]
32. Dehghan Manshdi M, Kamali Ardakani H, Hemati H. The mediating role of self–efficacy in relationship between parenting styles and happiness in students. Rooyesh–e–Ravanshenasi Journal. 2020;9(7):109–18. [Persian] [Article]
33. Fakoor F, Sahebdel H, Ebrahimpour M. Development of a parenting education package based on motivational psychotherapy and its feasibility study on improving mothers' parenting and reducing anxiety in boys with confrontational disobedience. Rooyesh–e–Ravanshenasi Journal. 2022;11(3):149–58. [Persian] [Article]
34. Bandura A. Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2006;1(2):164–80. [DOI]
35. French DP, Wright JD. Self–efficacy and health. In: International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Elsevier BV; 2015. pp: 509–14.
36. Schunk DH. Self–efficacy and education and instruction. In: Maddux JE. Self–efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: theory, research, and application. Boston, MA: Springer US; 1995. pp: 281–303. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb