تعطیلات نوروز ۱۴۰۴-ضمن آرزوی قبولی طاعات و عبادات و همچنین تبریک فرارسیدن بهار و شروع سال جدید، به اطلاع می‌رساند این نشریه از تاریخ ۲۸ اسفندماه ۱۴۰۳ لغایت ۱۵ فروردین ۱۴۰۴ تعطیل می باشد.

Volume 14 - Articles-1403                   MEJDS (2024) 14: 133 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Madani F, Alihashemi Ashtyani P, Janbozorgi M. Determining the Effectiveness of Cognitive-Analytical Intervention of Group-Based Treatment of Obsessions on Guilt and Personality Function in People with Symptoms of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders. MEJDS 2024; 14 :133-133
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3004-en.html
1- MA in General Psychology, Quds Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- MA in Counseling and Guidance, Rodhan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3- Professor of the Department of Psychology, Hozah and University Research Institute, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (996 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Obsessive-compulsive disorder is diagnosed based on the presence of unwanted and disturbing thoughts and repetitive behaviors. It was found that guilt can arise from extreme expectations and obsessive behaviors. If these symptoms are severe, a form of obsessive–compulsive disorder is created, the nature of which is determined by intrusive thoughts and images and unwanted compulsive behaviors. On the other hand, research has shown that personality, with its differences in emotion and cognition, can be considered a predisposing factor for developing psychiatric disorders such as obsessive–compulsive disorder. Several psychological treatment methods have been used in addition to drug therapy, including psychoanalysis, behavioral therapy, cognitive therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, family therapy, and so on. As a short–term treatment, cognitive–analytic therapy effectively works to solve problems and strengthen the patient's motivation to make lifestyle changes by adopting a knowledge–based approach. So, the present study aims to determine the effectiveness of the cognitive–analytical intervention of group–based treatment of obsessions on guilt and personality functioning in people with obsessive–compulsive symptoms.
Methods: This research method was quasi–experimental with a pre–test–posttest design with one experimental group and one control group. The statistical population of the current research comprised all people suffering from obsessive–compulsive disorder who were referred to Talieh Salamat Clinic in Tehran City, Iran, in 2021. Due to the lack of easy access, this research used an available sampling method. In this way, 30 people were selected from the statistical population and randomly divided into the experimental and control groups (each group included 15 people). Then, both groups responded to the Guilt Questionnaire (Kugler and Jones, 1992) and the Personality Functioning Questionnaire (Janbozorgi et al., 2022). After that, the obsession treatment intervention was implemented in the experimental group, and the control group was not subjected to any treatment program. In the end, the posttest was done again from both groups. Also, after the end of the research, the treatment programs implemented in this research were implemented in the control group to maintain ethical standards. The inclusion criteria included suffering from obsessive–compulsive disorder, at least having a diploma level of education, not participating in other therapeutic interventions at the same time, and not suffering from another psychological disease at the same time. The exclusion criteria included the absence of more than three therapy sessions and non–observance of group therapy rules. This study's ethical standards included obtaining informed consent and ensuring privacy and confidentiality. Also, during the research, participants were free to withdraw from the study at any time and to provide personal information. They were assured that the information would remain confidential, and this was also fully observed. Data analysis was carried out in two parts: descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. At the level of descriptive statistics, frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation were used. Multivariate covariance analysis was used at the level of inferential statistics. Data analysis was done using SPSS software version 24, and the significance level of the tests was considered to be 0.05.
Results: The results showed that cognitive–analytical intervention for obsessive–compulsive disorder treatment improved the scores of the components of identity, intimacy, empathy, psychosis, burnout, negative affectivity, and conflict in the personality functioning variable and all components of the guilt variable, including moral standards, trait guilt, and state guilt, in individuals with obsessive–compulsive symptoms (p<0.001).
Conclusion: According to the study results, treating obsessions with a cognitive–analytical approach improves guilt and personality functioning in people with symptoms of obsessive–compulsive disorder. Therefore, it is recommended that researchers and therapists use this method for their patients.

Full-Text [PDF 283 kb]   (63 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Torres AR, Cruz BL, Vicentini HC, Lima MCP, Ramos-Cerqueira ATA. Obsessive-compulsive symptoms in medical students: prevalence, severity, and correlates. Acad Psychiatry. 2016;40(1):46–54. [DOI]
2. Jaisoorya T, Janardhan Reddy Y, Nair Bs, Rani A, Menon P, Revamma M, et al. Prevalence and correlates of obsessive-compulsive disorder and subthreshold obsessive-compulsive disorder among college students in Kerala, India. Indian J Psychiatry. 2017;59(1):56. [DOI]
3. American Psychiatric Association. Structured clinical interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2015.
4. Melli G, Chiorri C, Carraresi C, Stopani E, Bulli F. The role of disgust propensity and trait guilt in OCD symptoms: a multiple regression model in a clinical sample. J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord. 2015;5:43–8. [DOI]
5. Sangani A, Khoshvaght N, Azizi L, Abolghasemzadeh M. Modeling obsession with guilty feelings with mediating role of self-compassion nurses. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing. 2019;7(3):70–7. [Persian]
6. Alipour F, Saidpour S, Hasani J. The comparison of sensation seeking in sex addicts, stimulant addicts, opioid addicts and normal individual. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2015;25(125):135–8. [Persian] [Article]
7. Ganji M. Psychopathology based on DSM-5. Tehran: Savalan; 2016. [Persian]
8. Hopwood CJ. Personality traits in the DSM–5. J Pers Assess. 2011;93(4):398–405. [DOI]
9. Skodol AE, Morey LC, Bender DS, Oldham JM. The alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders: a clinical application. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172(7):606–13. [DOI]
10. Parker G, Hadzi‐Pavlovic D, Both L, Kumar S, Wilhelm K, Olley A. Measuring disordered personality functioning: to love and to work reprised. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004;110(3):230–9. [DOI]
11. Neziroglu F, McKay D. Introduction to the special issue: complexities and new developments in adolescent obsessive-compulsive related disorders. Clinical Case Studies. 2018;17(4):191–4. [DOI]
12. Hepple J. Cognitive‐analytic therapy in a group: reflections on a dialogic approach. Br J Psychother. 2012;28(4):474–95. [DOI]
13. Boschen MJ, Drummond LM. Community treatment of severe, refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behav Res Ther. 2012;50(3):203–9. [DOI]
14. Ryle A, Kerr IB. Introducing cognitive analytic therapy: principles and practice. John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
15. Yousefi A, Rahimian Boger I, Rezaei AM. The effectiveness of cognitive analytic therapy on mental health of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2013;5(3):1–10. [Persian] [Article]
16. Delavar A. Educational and psychological research. Tehran: Virayesh Pub; 2015. [Persian]
17. Kugler K, Jones WH. On conceptualizing and assessing guilt. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992;62(2):318–27. [DOI]
18. Janbozorgi M, Nouhi S, Naserifadafan M, Heydarizad M, Janbozorgi A. Construction, standardization and standardization of personality questionnaire based on DSM-5. Journal of Clinical Health Psychology. 2022;1(1):29–41. [Persian]
19. Aftab R, Bermas H, Abolmaali Alhoseini K. Structural prediction model of suicidal ideation based on the big five personality traits with the mediation of guilt. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2021;11:106. [Persian] [Article]
20. Janbozorgi M, Rajezi Esfahani S. Multi-dimensional group therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry & Clinical Psychology. 2012;17(4):289–96. [Persian] [Article]
21. Nazemi MJ, Tabatabaei SS, Moeeni F, Goodarzi N, Tatari E. Effectiveness of cognitive analytic therapy on reducing guilt fleeing and doubt in people with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Paramedical Sciences and Military Health. 2020;15(2):10–8. [Persian] [Article]
22. Bateman AW, Ryle A, Fonagy P, Kerr IB. Psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: mentalization based therapy and cognitive analytic therapy compared. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2007;19(1):51–62. [DOI]
23. Ames DR. Assertiveness expectancies: How hard people push depends on the consequences they predict. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008;95(6):1541–57. [DOI]
24. Zargar Y, Mardani M, Mehrabizadeh Honarmand M. Effect of cognitive-behavioral intervention on perfectionism and guilt feeling of university students. Applied Psychology. 2011;6(4):71–85. [Persian] [Article]
25. McCutcheon LK, Kerr IB, Chanen AM. Cognitive analytic therapy: a relational approach to young people with severe personality disorder. In: Kramer U; editor. Case formulation for personality disorders. Elsevier; 2019. [DOI]
26. Ganbari Hashem Abadi B, Chagosaz M, Ghaseminiaii F, Akbari Klor SM, Mosavi SJ, Jadidi S. The effectiveness of cognitive-analytical group therapy on experiential avoidance and rumination in students with major depressive disorder. Journal of Psychological Studies. 2019;15(3):89–104. [Persian] [Article]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb