Volume 14 - Articles-1403                   MEJDS (2024) 14: 62 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.SSRI.REC.1400.1190

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Pirrasoulzadeh M, Dehghanizadeh J. The Effect of Functional Balance, Cognitive Functions and the Risk of Fall on the Quality of Life in People with Intellectual Disabilities. MEJDS 2024; 14 :62-62
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3107-en.html
1- MS in Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Motor Behavior, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Urmia, Urmia, Iran
Abstract:   (857 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Intellectual disability is defined as a significantly reduced ability to perceive new or complex information and to learn and apply new skills (intelligence impairment). Studies have shown several limitations in the mobility of people with intellectual disabilities, often due to the high prevalence of balance disorders in these individuals. Therefore, their balance is not as stable as that of normal people and they often experience a high risk of falling and physical, psychological and social injuries. Weak balance and frequent falls cause fear of falling and ultimately affect a person's quality of life, which reduces a person's independence and increases the ability to depend on others for daily activities. It reduces social interactions and the ability to control the life of the disabled person. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the factors that may increase the quality of life in this group. This study aimed to investigate the effect of functional balance, cognitive functions and the risk of fall on the quality of life in people with intellectual disabilities.
Methods: The present research was a descriptive–analytical study of correlational type conducted in 2021. The statistical population of the research comprised adults with intellectual disabilities aged 18–55 years. They belonged to the mild, moderate, or severe classification of disabilities and lived in the cities of Ardabil, Tabriz and Urmia, Iran. The statistical sample of this study included 61 adults with intellectual disabilities with a mean age of 34.31 years in Ardabil, Tabriz, and Urmia. They were selected by convenience sampling method. The data of this study were collected by the World Health Organization Quality of Life–BREF (WHOQOL– BREF) (WHO, 1996), the Prudhoe Cognitive Function Test (PCFT) (Kay et al., 2003), The Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool (JHFRAT) (Poe et al., 2007), and the Functional Reach Test (FRT) (Duncan and et al., 1990). To investigate the relationship between quality of life with functional balance, risk of fall and cognitive functions, the Pearson correlation method was used. To understand the contribution of each dimension to predict quality of life, the regression model was used for independent variable of functional balance.
Results: The results showed a significant relationship between the variables of quality of life with functional balance (r=0.296, p=0.021). Also, 8.9% of changes on quality of life in people with intellectual disability are explained through functional balance.
Conclusion: According to the results, there is a positive and significant relationship between quality of life and functional balance. Also, it is possible to predict the quality of life through functional balance. Therefore, to improve the quality of life in people with intellectual disability it is suggested that counselors and therapists include the balance system rehabilitation and training in daily life activities in the treatment plans.

Full-Text [PDF 323 kb]   (282 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Rehabilitation

References
1. Intellectual disability: definition, classification, and systems of supports. 11th ed. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities; 2010.
2. Piri S, Roozbahani M, Avazpoor A. The effect of rhythmic games on the social development of educable mentally retarded students. J Educ Manage Stud. 2015;5(4):223–7.
3. Wuang YP, Wang CC, Huang MH, Su CY. Profiles and cognitive predictors of motor functions among early school–age children with mild intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2008;52(12):1048–60. [DOI]
4. Dastjerdi M. A comparative study on the basic motor skills in mentally retarded children. Journal of Exceptional Children. 2003;2(4):333–58. [Persian] [Article]
5. Cleaver S, Hunter D, Ouellette–Kuntz H. Physical mobility limitations in adults with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009;53(2):93–105. [DOI]
6. Hausdorff JM, Rios DA, Edelberg HK. Gait variability and fall risk in community–living older adults: a 1-year prospective study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(8):1050–6. [DOI]
7. Smulders E, Enkelaar L, Weerdesteyn V, Geurts ACH, van Schrojenstein Lantman–de Valk H. Falls in older persons with intellectual disabilities: fall rate, circumstances and consequences. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013;57(12):1173–82. [DOI]
8. Kubilay N, yıldırım Y, Kara B, Akdur H. Effect of balance training and posture exercises on functional level in mental retardation. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon. 2011;22(2):55–64.
9. Cooper SA, van der Speck R. Epidemiology of mental ill health in adults with intellectual disabilities. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009;22(5):431–6. [DOI]
10. Cooper SA, Smiley E, Morrison J, Williamson A, Allan L. Mental ill–health in adults with intellectual disabilities: prevalence and associated factors. Br J Psychiatry. 2007;190:27–35. [DOI]
11. Smiley E, Cooper SA, Finlayson J, Jackson A, Allan L, Mantry D, et al. Incidence and predictors of mental ill–health in adults with intellectual disabilities: prospective study. Br J Psychiatry. 2007;191:313–9. [DOI]
12. Almuhtaseb S, Oppewal A, Hilgenkamp TIM. Gait characteristics in individuals with intellectual disabilities: a literature review. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(11):2858–83. [DOI]
13. Diamond A. Close interrelation of motor development and cognitive development and of the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex. Child Dev. 2000;71(1):44–56. [DOI]
14. Enkelaar L, Smulders E, van Schrojenstein Lantman–de Valk H, Geurts ACH, Weerdesteyn V. A review of balance and gait capacities in relation to falls in persons with intellectual disability. Res Dev Disabil. 2012;33(1):291–306. [DOI]
15. Carey IM, Shah SM, Hosking FJ, DeWilde S, Harris T, Beighton C, et al. Health characteristics and consultation patterns of people with intellectual disability: a cross–sectional database study in English general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2016;66(645):e264–70. [DOI]
16. Patel DR, Greydanus DE. Sport participation by physically and cognitively challenged young athletes. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2010;57(3):795–817. [DOI]
17. Simões C, Santos S. Comparing the quality of life of adults with and without intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016;60(4):378–88. [DOI]
18. Edwards TC, Patrick DL, Topolski TD. Quality of life of adolescents with perceived disabilities. J Pediatr Psychol. 2003;28(4):233–41. [DOI]
19. Schalock RL, Verdugo MÁ. Handbook on quality of life for human service practitioners. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation; 2002.
20. Biddle S, Fox KR, Boutcher SH, editors. Physical activity and psychological well–being. London ; New York: Routledge; 2000.
21. Sharifi HP, Sharifi N. Research methods in behavioral sciences. Tehran: Sokhan Pub; 2020. [Persian]
22. World Health Organization. Division of Mental Health WHOQOL–BREF: introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment: field trial version, December 1996 [Internet]. World Health Organization; 1996. Available from: [Article]
23. Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA, WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL–BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(2):299–310. [DOI]
24. Nejat S, Montazeri A, Holakouie Naieni K, Mohammad K, Majdzadeh SR. The world health organization quality of life (WHOQOL–BREF) questionnaire: translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research. 2006;4(4):1–12. [Persian] [Article]
25. Kay DWK, Tyrer SP, Margallo–Lana ML, Moore PB, Fletcher R, Berney TP, et al. Preliminary evaluation of a scale to assess cognitive function in adults with Down’s syndrome: the Prudhoe Cognitive Function Test. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2003;47(Pt 3):155–68. [DOI]
26. De Vreese LP, Gomiero T, De Bastiani E, Marangoni A, Weger E, Mantesso U. Short forms of prudhoe cognitive function test in adults and aging people with intellectual disabilities: Italian validation study. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2021;65(2):162–72. [DOI]
27. Poe SS, Cvach M, Dawson PB, Straus H, Hill EE. The Johns Hopkins fall risk assessment tool: postimplementation evaluation. J Nurs Care Qual. 2007;22(4):293–8. [DOI]
28. Poe SS, Dawson PB, Cvach M, Burnett M, Kumble S, Lewis M, et al. The Johns Hopkins fall risk assessment tool: a study of reliability and validity. J Nurs Care Qual. 2018;33(1):10–9. [DOI]
29. Hojati H, Dadgari A, Mirrezaie SM. Validity and reliability of Persian version of Johns Hopkins fall risk assessment tool among aged people. Qom University of Medical Sciences Journal. 2018;12(2):45–53. [Persian] [DOI]
30. Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler J, Studenski S. Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol. 1990;45(6):M192–197. [DOI]
31. Aslankhani MA, Farsi A, Fathirezaie Z, Zamani Sani SH, Aghdasi MT. Validity and reliability of the timed up and go and the anterior functional reach tests in evaluating fall risk in the elderly. Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2015;10(1):16–25. [Persian] [Article]
32. Karinkanta S, Heinonen A, Sievanen H, Uusi–Rasi K, Kannus P. Factors predicting dynamic balance and quality of life in home–dwelling elderly women. Gerontology. 2005;51(2):116–21. [DOI]
33. Behnam Moghadam M, Behnam Moghadam A, Yarian S, Hosseini SM, Mohammad Hosseini S. Predicting the quality of life based on public health, social support and self efficacy in cardiovascular patients. Armaghane Danesh. 2014;19(7):633–42. [Persian] [Article]
34. Lombardi M, Croce L, Claes C, Vandevelde S, Schalock RL. Factors predicting quality of life for people with intellectual disability: results from the ANFFAS study in Italy. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability. 2016;41(4):338–47. [DOI]
35. Simões C, Santos S. The impact of personal and environmental characteristics on quality of life of people with intellectual disability. Applied Research in Quality of Life. 2017;12(2):389–408. [DOI]
36. González–Salvador T, Lyketsos CG, Baker A, Hovanec L, Roques C, Brandt J, et al. Quality of life in dementia patients in long–term care. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000;15(2):181–9. [DOI]
37. Gur A. Challenging behavior, functioning difficulties, and quality of life of adults with intellectual disabilities. Int J Dev Disabil. 2016;64(1):45–52. [DOI]
38. Evenhuis H, Henderson CM, Beange H, Lennox N, Chicoine B. Healthy ageing–Adults with intellectual disabilities: physical health issues. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 2001;14(3):175–94. [DOI]
39. Bergland A, Thorsen H, Kåresen R. Effect of exercise on mobility, balance, and health-related quality of life in osteoporotic women with a history of vertebral fracture: a randomized, controlled trial. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(6):1863–71. [DOI]
40. Giagazoglou P, Arabatzi F, Dipla K, Liga M, Kellis E. Effect of a hippotherapy intervention program on static balance and strength in adolescents with intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2012;33(6):2265–70. [DOI]
41. Cuesta Vargas A, Perez Cruzado D, Rodriguez Moya A. Relationship between quality of life and physical fitness in adults with intellectual disabilities. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities. 2022;16(1):44–52.
42. Granger CV, Dewis LS, Peters NC, Sherwood CC, Barrett JE. Stroke rehabilitation: analysis of repeated Barthel index measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979;60(1):14–7.
43. Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Vahdaninia M, Gandek B. The short form health survey (SF–36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(3):875–82. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb