Comparing the Effectiveness of Gottman's Couple Therapy with Couple Therapy Based on Choice Theory on Couples' Attachment Anxiety

Mahdavi , Hesam; Farhangi, Abdolhassn; Jadidi, Hooshang

Volume 14 - Articles-1403 MEJDS (2024) 14: 55 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.IAU.TNB.REC.1403.003

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Mahdavi H, Farhangi A, Jadidi H. Comparing the Effectiveness of Gottman's Couple Therapy with Couple Therapy Based on Choice Theory on Couples' Attachment Anxiety. MEJDS 2024; 14 :55-55
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3356-en.html

Comparing the Effectiveness of Gottman's Couple Therapy with Couple Therapy Based on Choice Theory on Couples' Attachment Anxiety

Hesam Mahdavi¹

, Abdolhassn Farhangi ^*²

, Hooshang Jadidi³

1- Islamic Azad University, Tehran Shomal, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Shomal, Tehran, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran

Abstract: (579 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Early communication quality plays an essential role in adult marital relationships; therefore, according to experts, communication problems are among the main topics in family-related investigations. One of the most critical factors in establishing healthy relationships is the orientation of people's attachment. Insecurity and attachment anxiety have been introduced as essential factors of marital problems, dissatisfaction, and instability in marital life. Early interactions and relationships with influential people in life create expectations and beliefs in people that direct their perceptions and social behavior about how relationships and relationship partners will be in adulthood. These beliefs play a role in determining people's expected behaviors and actions in attachment situations. Attachment anxiety causes a couple's interpersonal damage. Therefore, the present study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of Gottman's couple therapy with couple therapy based on choice theory on couples' attachment anxiety.
Methods: The research method was quasi-experimental, using a pretest-posttest and follow-up design with a control group. The statistical population of the research comprised all the couples referred to Nejat Sexual Counseling Center in Tehran City, Iran, in 2022. Of them, 45 volunteer and eligible couples were selected. After homogenization of age and duration of marital life, they were assigned to two experimental and one control group(s). Then, the couples of all three groups were evaluated in the pretest and responded to the Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire-Revised (ECR-R) (Brennan et al., 1998). After that, the couple therapy sessions were conducted for two experimental groups, while the control group was not subjected to any educational intervention. Gottman's couple therapy interventions were performed in 9 sessions once a week, and each session lasted 90 minutes for one experimental group. The couple therapy based on choice theory was performed in 10 sessions once a week, and each session lasted 90 minutes for another experimental group. Finally, the three groups were re-evaluated in the posttest to measure the effect of the independent variables (Gottman's couple therapy and couple therapy based on choice theory) on the dependent variable (attachment anxiety). After 3 months, a follow-up test was conducted to determine the stability of the effectiveness of couple therapy strategies over time. To analyze the data, analysis of variance with repeated measurements and Bonferroni post hoc test was used in SPSS software and the significance level was set at 0.05.
Results: The findings showed significant effects of group, time, and the interaction of group and time on attachment anxiety (p<0.001). Also, the results indicated a significant difference between the mean scores of Gottman's couple therapy and couple therapy based on selection theory with each other (p=0.044) and with the control group (p=0.033) and (p=0.045) in the attachment anxiety variable. In the two test groups, a significant difference was observed in the mean scores of attachment anxiety in the pretest, posttest, and follow-up (p=0.001). However, no significant difference was observed between the posttest and the follow-up in the two experimental groups, which showed the persistence of the effectiveness of both couples therapy approaches in the follow-up stage (p>0.05).
Conclusion: Based on the findings of the research, Gottman's couple therapy is more effective in reducing attachment anxiety than couples therapy based on choice theory. Therefore, this program is suggested as a preventive approach to problems of a couple.

Keywords: Attachment anxiety, Gottman's couple therapy, Couple therapy based on choice theory

Full-Text [PDF 536 kb] (406 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References

1. Maydanchi RM, Yaghobi A, Goodarzy K, Karimi J. Comparing the effectiveness of training of emotionally-focused approach and choice theory on couple's marital satisfaction and burnout. Journal of Family Research. 2020;16(3):377–93. [Persian] [Article]

2. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss. New York: Basic Books; 1980.

3. Givertz M, Woszidlo A, Segrin C, Knutson K. Direct and indirect effects of attachment orientation on relationship quality and loneliness in married couples. J Soc Pers Relat. 2013;30(8):1096–120. [DOI]

4. Hazan C, Shaver PR. Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychol Inq. 1994;5(1):1–22. [DOI]

5. Arianfar N, Rasuli R, Hosseinian S, Etemadi O. Identifying couples' interpersonal pathologies among women with attachment anxiety. Journal of Family Research. 2020;16(2):155–82. [Persian] [Article]

6. Johnson LN, Tambling RB, Mennenga KD, Ketring SA, Oka M, Anderson SR, et al. Examining attachment avoidance and attachment anxiety across eight sessions of couple therapy. J Marital Fam Ther. 2016;42(2):195–212. [DOI]

7. Benson LA, Sevier M, Christensen A. The impact of behavioral couple therapy on attachment in distressed couples. J Marital Fam Ther. 2013;39(4):407–20. [DOI]

8. Irvine TJ. Validating the effectiveness of a gottman method couples therapy intervention, the trust revival method, for affair recovery: a randomized control trial [PhD dissertation]. [Boca Raton, Florida]: Florida Atlantic University; 2022.

9. Haji Adineh S, Kalhornia Golkar M. Effectiveness of group training based on choice theory on marital adjustment and sexual satisfaction of couples. Journal of Research in Behavioural Sciences. 2019;17(2):193–204. [Persian] [DOI]

10. Soltanifar A, Moharari F, Rajai Z, Ziaee M, Salimi Z. Effect of psychoeducation based on choice theory on marital satisfaction and increasing couples' adaptability: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Electronic Physician. 2019;11(2):7499–506. [DOI]

11. Gottman JM, Gottman JS. Gottman method couple therapy. In: Gurman AS; editor. Clinical handbook of couple therapy. The Guilford Press; 2008.

12. Mortazavi M, Rasooli R, Hoseinian S, Zareei H. Effectiveness of the prevention and relationship enhancement program based on Gottman & Glaser's integrated approach to love, respect, and marital intimacy. Journal of Applied Psychological Research. 2020;11(1):137–49. [Persian] [Article]

13. Glasser W. My vision for the international journal of choice theory and reality therapy. International Journal of Choice Theory and Reality Therapy. 2010;29(2):12.

14. Wilson Van Voorhis CR, Morgan BL. Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2007;3(2):43–50. [DOI]

15. Brennan KA, Clark CL, Shaver PR. Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In: Simpson JA, Rholes WS; editors. Attachment theory and close relationships. The Guilford Press; 1998.

16. Wei M, Russell DW, Zakalik RA. Adult attachment, social self-efficacy, self-disclosure, loneliness, and subsequent depression for freshman college students: a longitudinal study. J Couns Psychol. 2005;52(4):602–14. [DOI]

17. Wei M, Shaffer PA, Young SK, Zakalik RA. Adult attachment, shame, depression, and loneliness: the mediation role of basic psychological needs satisfaction. J Couns Psychol. 2005;52(4):591–601. [DOI]

18. Poravari M, Ghanbari S, ZadehMohammadi A, Panaghi L. Validity, reliability and factor structure of close relationship experiences-relationship structure questionnaire (ECR-RS). In: National Family Pathology Congress (and National Family Research Festival) [Internet]. 2014. [Persian]

19. EbadiRad SM, Kariminejad K. The effectiveness of Gottman's cognitive systemic couple therapy on marital commitment of Mashhad'couples. Family Pathology, Counseling and Enrichment Journal. 2017;3(1):75–92. [Persian] [Article]

20. Joulazadeh Esmaeili AA, Karimi J, Goodarzi K, Asgari M. Comparison of the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment-based couple therapy and emotionally focused couple therapy on unadjusted couples' attachment styles. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2020;9(2):1–30. [Persian] [Article]

21. Supeni I, Jazimin Jusoh A. Choice theory and reality therapy to prevent sexual misconduct among youth: a current review of literature. International Journal of Education, Information Technology, and Others. 2021;4(3):428–36. [DOI]