Volume 5 -                   MEJDS (2015) 5: 14 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mojiri F, Afshari Bahmanbiglu S, Abnavi F. Examining the Differences between the Acoustic Parameters of Persian and Turkish-Qashqai Languages in Persian/Turkish-Qashqai Bilinguals. MEJDS 2015; 5 :14-21
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-403-en.html
Examining the Differences between the Acoustic Parameters of Persian and Turkish-Qashqai Languages in Persian/Turkish-Qashqai Bilinguals
Fariba Mojiri1 , Samad Afshari Bahmanbiglu * 1, Fateme Abnavi1
1- Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Abstract:   (18253 Views)

Objective: Vocal characteristics can be influenced by the speakers’ race or ethnicity, age and the language used. How language alone influences vocal quality still remains unclear. To study how language alone affects vocal quality, the effect of age, race or ethnicity need to be excluded. This can be done by studying vocal characteristics associated with languages produced by adult bilingual speakers.

Methods: This was a descriptive-analytic cross-sectional study. 32 Persian/Turkish-Qashqai bilinguals (16 men and 16 women) who possessed the inclusion criteria were studied. Two continuous speech samples (Persian and Turkish-Qashqai) were obtained from the subjects. Fundamental Frequency values were obtained by the PRAAT software.

Results: The mean fundamental frequency values in Persian and Turkish-Qashqai were 178.40 and 180.41 Hertz. The standard deviations in the two groups were 28.68 and 28.83, respectively. The mean Fundamental Frequency Range for Persian and Turkish-Qashqai were 227.69 and 218.62, respectively. The aforementioned numbers indicate that their differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Given that the values of Fundamental Frequency were not significantly different between the Persian and Turkish-Qashqai languages, we can say that language has no effect on the voice of these people. Therefore, the same clinical norms of Fundamental Frequency that are used for Persians can be used for Turkish-Qashqai people too.

Keywords: Acoustics, Fundamental Frequency, Bilingual, Persian Language, Turkish-Qashqai Language
Full-Text [PDF 690 kb]   (4166 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Rehabilitation
References
1. Andrianopoulos MV, Darrow KN, Chen J. Multimodal standardization of voice among four multicultural populations: fundamental frequency and spectral characteristics. J Voice. 2001;15(2):194-219. [DOI:10.1016/S0892-1997(01)00021-2]
2. Hasanati F, Jalalipur M, Latifi SM, Gudarz M, Saleh M, Dabiri S. Study of Phonological Awareness Skills among FarsiMonolingual and Farsi-Arabic Bilingual Students in the Second Grade in Ahvaz. Advances in Cognitive Sceince. 2012;14 (1) :67-74. [Persian]
3. Altenberg EP, Ferrand CT. Fundamental frequency in monolingual English, bilingual English/Russian, and bilingual English/Cantonese young adult women. J Voice. 2006;20(1):89-96. [DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.01.005]
4. Andrianopoulos MV, Darrow K, Chen J. Multimodal standardization of voice among four multicultural populations' formant structures. J Voice. 2001;15(1):61-77. [DOI:10.1016/S0892-1997(01)00007-8]
5. Ng ML, Chen Y, Chan EY. Differences in Vocal Characteristics between Cantonese and English Produced by Proficient Cantonese-English Bilingual Speakers-A Long-Term Average Spectral Analysis. J Voice. 2012;26(4):e171-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.07.013]
6. Abu Al Makarem A, Petrosino L. Reading and spontaneous speaking fundamental frequency of young Arabic men for Arabic and English languages: a comparative study 1, 2. Percept Mot Skills. 2007;105(2):572-80. [DOI:10.2466/pms.105.2.572-580]
7. Ng ML, Hsueh G, Sam Leung CS. Voice pitch characteristics of Cantonese and English produced by Cantonese-English bilingual children. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010;12(3):230-6. [DOI:10.3109/17549501003721080]
8. Ghorbani A, Torabinejad F, Armandi L. Fundamental frequency in males and females voice from Iranian, Turk, and Kurd race. Audiology. 2006;14(2):45-50.
9. KhoramShahi H, Javadipour S, Noori H, Dashteleie AA. Comparing Average Fundamental Frequency among Persian and Persian-Arabic Male Students Aged Between 18 to 25 Years. Jundishapur Sci Med J. 2014;12 (6) :715-21.[Persian]
10. Morris RJ. Speaking fundamental frequency characteristics of 8-through 10-year-old white-and African-American boys. J Commun Disord. 1997;30(2):101-16. [DOI:10.1016/S0021-9924(96)00057-3]
11. Kooijman PG, Thomas G, Graamans K, de Jong F. Psychosocial impact of the teacher's voice throughout the career. J Voice. 2007;21(3):316-24. [DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.12.007]
12. Casper JK, Leonard R. Understanding voice problems: A physiological perspective for diagnosis and treatment. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
13. Eskenazi L, Childers DG, Hicks DM. Acoustic correlates of vocal quality. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1990;33(2):298-306. [DOI:10.1044/jshr.3302.298]
14. Howard DM. Voice science acoustics and recording. Plural Publishing; 2008.
15. Jahangiri N. The physics of speech: An Introduction to Acoustic Phonetics. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad;1990. [Persian]
16. Knuppel M. Qasqai tribal confederacy ii. Language. Encyclopædia Iranica.2009.
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb