Effect of Panoura and Filippo's Metacognitive Instruction Model on Mathematics Performance, Self-Concept, Self-Regulation and Motivation for Students at Fourth Grade of Elementary School with Mathematical Disability

Yarmohammadian, Ahmad; Ghamarani, Amir; Ghasemi, Mehri

Volume 5 - MEJDS (2015) 5: 169 | Back to browse issues page

‎ 20.1001.1.23222840.1394.5.0.15.9

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Yarmohammadian A, Ghamarani A, Ghasemi M. Effect of Panoura and Filippo's Metacognitive Instruction Model on Mathematics Performance, Self-Concept, Self-Regulation and Motivation for Students at Fourth Grade of Elementary School with Mathematical Disability. MEJDS 2015; 5 :169-178
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-438-en.html

Effect of Panoura and Filippo's Metacognitive Instruction Model on Mathematics Performance, Self-Concept, Self-Regulation and Motivation for Students at Fourth Grade of Elementary School with Mathematical Disability

Ahmad Yarmohammadian ^*

¹, Amir Ghamarani¹

, Mehri Ghasemi¹

1- University of Isfahan

Abstract: (16140 Views)

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of Panoura and Filippo's metacognitive instruction model on improving math performance, self-concept, self-regulation and motivation for students with learning disabilities in math was done.

Methods: The research method was quasi-experimental. In this regard, 30 fourth grade students of Isfahan city cluster random sampling in two experimental groups and one control group. Tools used include MCQ Panvra and Filippo, a checklist related disorders Tabrizi math, Raven Intelligence Scale and Performance Test were studying mathematics. The experimental group received 12 sessions of 60 minutes and Filippo was taught Panvra model meta-cognitive learning techniques, then again one month after the test was taken from both groups.

Results: The multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) showed that there is a significant difference between the experimental group and the control group in terms of academic performance, self-concept, self-regulation, and motivation. Taken together, these findings suggest that skill training has positive impacts on mathematics performance, self-concept, self-regulation and motivation in students with mathematics learning disabilities (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Metacognitive interventions such as learning mathematics basic skills can be an effective approach to improve mathematics learning disabilities.

Keywords: Mathematics learning disability, Panoura and Filippo's metacognitive instruction model, self-concept, self-regulation, motivation

Full-Text [PDF 245 kb] (4399 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Rehabilitation

References

1. Vanmeirhaeghe, B. (2012). Divided by numbers. Studying with dyscalculia.Documentary. Artevelde University College: Gent, Belgium.

2. Marzuky,w&Fauzi (2010). Mathematics Self-efficacy and Meta-cognition Among universityStudents.International Conference on Mathematics Education Research.

3. Silver, C. H., Ruff, R. M., Iverson, G. L., Barth, J. T., Broshek, D. K., Bush, S. S., Koffler, S. P., Reynolds, C. R. (2008). committee Learning. Journal of psychology. vol .10, No.1,165-172.

4. Barbaresi, W. J., Katusic, S. K., Colligan, R. C., Weaver, A. L, & Jacobsen, S. J. (2005). Learning disorder: Incidence in a population-based birth cohort, 19, 76-82. [DOI:10.1367/A04-209R.1]

5. Geary, D. C. (2011). Consequences, characteristics, and causes of mathematical learning disabilities and persistent low achievement in mathematics. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 32(3), 250-263. [DOI:10.1097/DBP.0b013e318209edef]

6. Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Bailey, D. H. (2011). Mathematical cognition deficits in children with learning disabilities and persistent low achievement: A five-year prospective study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 206-223. [DOI:10.1037/a0025398]

7. Shalev, R. S., Manor, O., & Gross-Tsur, V. (2005). Developmental dyscalculia: A prospective six-year follow-up. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 47(2),121-125. [DOI:10.1017/S0012162205000216]

8. Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H. & Miller, S. A. (1993). Cognitive development. New Jersey :Prentice.

9. Panoura, A. & Philippou, G. (2007). Young pupils ,meta cognitive ability in mathematics . Cognitive Development, 22, 2, 149-164. [DOI:10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.08.004]

10. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What all the fuss about metacognition? In A. H. Schoenfeld (ED.), Cognitive science and mathematics education.Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

11. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws. (ED.). Handbook for Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. New York: MacMillan. Pp.334-370.

12. 13. Aqajani, S.Narimani, M. & Asiaei, M. (1387). Comparison emotional and self-concept in gifted and normal students. Journal of Research in Exceptional children, 3, 317 -323.

13. Marsh. H.W. & Seeshing ,Yeung. A. (1997). Causal Effects of academic self -Concept on Academic Achivement. structural Education model of longitudinal data. (university of western sydney. mocarthur ). Journal of Edu. Psy.vol 89. No 1041 - 54. [DOI:10.1037//0022-0663.89.1.41]

14. DeEadra A. N. (2005). Teacher', Parents', and Students' perception of effectiveness school characteristics of two Texas urban exemplary open -enrolment charter schools.

15. Zimmerman, B. & ponz, J. (1988). Self-regulated learned. Which are the sub processes?Contemporary. Journal of educational psychology, 11, 13-30.

16. Matuga, M. J. (2009). Self-regulation, goal orientation, and academic achievement of secondary students in online university courses. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 4-11.

17. Aksan, N. (2009). A descriptive study: Epistemological beliefs and self regulated learning. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 896-901. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.159]

18. Pintrich, P.R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self - regulated Learning. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Hadnbook of Self - Regulation (451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. [DOI:10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3]

19. Schunk, D. H. (2008). Attributions as motivators of self regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B.J. Zimmerman. Motivation and self - regulated learning, 245-267. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

20. Seif, A. (1368). Educational psychology. Tehran: Agah Publications.

21. Arefnya, S., Sarandi, P. and Usefi, R. (1391). Comparison of early maladaptive schemas are middle school students with school anxiety and normal students. School Psychology Journal, 1 (4), 74-89.

22. Geary, D.C. (2006). Role of cognitive theory in the study of learning disability inmathematics. Journal of learning Disabilities, 38, 305-307. [DOI:10.1177/00222194050380040401]

23. Seif, A. (1384). Prvrshy.thran Psychology: Nshragah.

24. Dembo, M.H. (1994). Applying educational psychology (5th ed), New York: Longman.

25. Mantaggue,M.(1997). Self-regulation and mathematics instruction.Learning disabilities research &practice,22(1).25-83. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00232.x]

26. Desoete, A. Roeyers, H. Buysse, A. (2001). Meta cognition and Mathematical problem-solving in grade 3. journal of learning disabilities , 34(5). 435-449. [DOI:10.1177/002221940103400505]

27. Coutinho, S. (2008). Self-Efficacy meta cognition, and performance. North American.

28. Akturk, A.O. & Sahin,. I.(2011). Literature Review on Metacognition and its Measurement. Procedia social and behavioral sciences, 15(3), 3731-3736. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.364]

29. Ozsoy, G. (2010). An investigation of the relationship between metacognition and mathematics achievement.Asia Pacifi Edu.Rev. [DOI:10.1007/s12564-010-9129-6]

30. Kvedere, L. (2014). Mathematics Self-Efficacy, Self-Concept and Anxiety Among Grade Students in Latvia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2687 - 2690. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.636]

31. Friedrich, A. Jonkmann,K. Nagengast, B. Schmitz, B. Trautwein,U. (2013). Teachers' and students'perceptions of self-regulated learning and math competence: Differentiation aagreement. Learning and Individual Differences 27,26-34. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.06.005]

32. Timothy, J & Chen, P.(2009). Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: Variations across grade level and math context. Journal of School Psychology 47, 291-314. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.04.002]

33. Lucangeli, D. & Cornoldi, C. (2000). Mathematics and metacognition: what is the nature of the relationship? Mathematical Cognition. 3(2) , 121-139. [DOI:10.1080/135467997387443]

34. Ramazani, M. (1379). Restorative effect on learning programs for students dyscalculic, MS Thesis, Tehran University, School of Psychology.

35. Zare, H., Azghand, Ali Ahmadi, Noferesti, A. and Hsynayy, A. (1391). Effects of metacognitive instruction on solving mathematical learning disability. Journal of learning disabilities. 2 (2), 40-58.

36. Tabrizi, M. (1389) .drman mathematical problems. Tehran: Mental Nshrfra.

37. Ghaderi, M. (1391). The effect program Panvra and Filippo on improving the performance of problem solving, metacognition, metacognitive knowledge and skills for students with deficiencies in math. MA thesis. Branch.