A Review of Computer-Based Auditory Training Program

Yaribakht, Maryam; Movallali, Guita; Vakili, Samira

Volume 13 - Articles-1402 MEJDS (2023) 13: 163 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.IAU.SRB.REC.1400.203

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Yaribakht M, Movallali G, Vakili S. A Review of Computer-Based Auditory Training Program. MEJDS 2023; 13 :163-163
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2907-en.html

A Review of Computer-Based Auditory Training Program

Maryam Yaribakht¹

, Guita Movallali ^*²

, Samira Vakili³

1- PhD Student, Department of Psychology and Education of Exceptional Children, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Associate Professor, PhD, Psychology & Education of Exceptional Children, Pediatric Neurorehabilitation Research Center, USWR University, Tehran, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology and Education of Exceptional Children, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract: (1348 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Communication disorder is a consequence of deafness, which has been tackled since the beginning of audiology by installing hearing aids and hearing rehabilitation. Advances in audiology and rehabilitation programs have led to the emergence of computer–based auditory training programs. Several computer–based rehabilitation programs for hearing loss have been designed and put forward in foreign markets. However, only a handful of them have documented efﬁcacy measures. Those documented ones are mostly computer–based auditory training programs (CBATPs) for adults. Today's technology and electronic gadgets are not limited to adults. Children are adept at using gadgets, especially for gaming and learning. Although there are several CBATPs for children with hearing loss in the foreign market, their efﬁcacy is not well documented. A careful assessment of the existing programs and their structure is the ﬁrst step towards underpinning the evidence of the benefits of CBATPs for children. So, this study aimed to investigate the brands and characteristics of computer–based auditory training programs available abroad for deaf children.
Methods: This research is a scoping review study in which all articles published from April 2000 to the end of March 2022 were investigated. The review process in this study involved searching databases using different combinations of keywords. The databases searched were PubMed and Google Scholar. The keywords used for the search were "hearing loss," "hearing impairment," or "hearing aid,” "cochlear implant" and "auditory training," or "auditory rehabilitation,” "auditory therapy" or "auditory learning," and "computer–based,” "app–based," or "software" or "computer–based auditory training,” "CBAT," or "computer–assisted aural rehabilitation." This traditional database search approach proved to be a highly inefficient means to answer our research question: What CBAT programs are available for use by a deaf child in foreign markets? Despite careful attention to search terms and retrieving many studies, a few addressed descriptions of or research about particular products. In total, the abstracts of 124 articles were reviewed. Out of these, only a handful of items were valuable. Then, a more appropriate method was used to obtain the answer to the research question. Next, 12 computer–based auditory training programs were identified from the background review. A frequency count was performed to determine the number of times each computer–based hearing training program was reviewed to determine each program's importance. The names of the 12 programs were searched using exact phrases in Google's "advanced search" limiters. Also, the websites of three main cochlear implant manufacturers were searched: Adonis Bionics Corporation, Cochlear Corporation, and Med–EL. Finally, five products were identified.
Results: To review commercially available computer–based auditory training programs, the authors followed the framework used by Zhang, Miller, and Campbel. Twenty–nine features of the programs discussed were grouped into three categories: general product and purchase information, design features of educational samples, and listening and communication goals. The following programs were selected for review after an extensive search on Google: Angel Sound Training, Otto's World of Sounds, programs offered by Advanced Bionics, programs offered by MED–EL, and programs offered by Cochlear. Existing business programs cover many aspects of auditory training through various stimuli and activities. They also have activities for different age groups. However, there is no evidence to prove their effectiveness. It is very important to choose an appropriate measurement criterion to quantify the improvements resulting from the treatment accurately.
Conclusion: In general, computer–centered auditory training as a teleintervention for computer–based auditory rehabilitation can positively affect the auditory and communication skills of deaf children by creating an attractive educational environment and diverse spaces along with other rehabilitation and direct education interventions.

Keywords: Auditory training programs, Auditory rehabilitation, Computer–based, Software

Full-Text [PDF 643 kb] (302 Downloads)

Type of Study: Mini Review Article | Subject: Rehabilitation

References

1. Bornstein S. The importance of early identification and intervention for children with hearing loss. part 1: human development. J Healthc Commun. 2018;3:8. [DOI]

2. Bararipoor E, Movallali G. Review of research on hearing impaired children's behavioral and emotional disorders. The Scientific Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2018;7(3):274–84. [Persian] [Article]

3. Zhang M, Miller A, Campbell MM. Overview of nine computerized, home-based auditory-training programs for adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol. 2014;25(4):405–13. [DOI]

4. Nanjundaswamy M, Prabhu P, Rajanna RK, Ningegowda RG, Firdose H, Sharma M. Benefits of computerized auditory training software for Kannada speaking children with hearing impairment – parent's perspective. Hearing, Balance and Communication. 2017;15(4):227–34. [DOI]

5. Olson AD, Tara B. Using computerized auditory training clinically for adults with cochlear implants. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 2010. [Article]

6. Sweetow RW, Henderson Sabes J. Auditory training and challenges associated with participation and compliance. J Am Acad Audiol. 2010;21(09):586–93. [DOI]

7. Sweetow R, Palmer CV. Efficacy of individual auditory training in adults: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;16(07):494–504. [DOI]

8. Pallarito K. Retraining the brain when hearing aids aren't enough. Hear J. 2011;64(8):25. [DOI]

9. Hull RH. A brief treatise on the service of aural rehabilitation. Hear J. 2011;64(4):14. [DOI]

10. Jain A. Apps marketplaces and the telecom value chain. IEEE Wireless Commun. 2011;18(4):4–5. [DOI]

11. Fu QJ, Nogaki G, Galvin JJ. Auditory training with spectrally shifted speech: implications for cochlear implant patient auditory rehabilitation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2005;6(2):180–9. [DOI]

12. Sweetow R, Sabes J. Listening and communication enhancement (LACE). Semin Hear. 2007;28(2):133–41. [DOI]

13. Yaribakht M, Movallali G. The effects of an early family-centered tele-intervention on the preverbal and listening skills of deaf children under tow years old. Iranian Journal of Rehabilitation. 2020;18(2):117–24. [DOI]

14. Bronus K, El Refaie A, Pryce H. Auditory training and adult rehabilitation: a critical review of the evidence. Global Journal of Health Science. 2011;3(1):49. [DOI]

15. Henshaw H, Ferguson MA. Efficacy of individual computer-based auditory training for people with hearing loss: a systematic review of the evidence. Plos One. 2013;8(5):e62836. [DOI]

16. Pizarek R, Shafiro V, McCarthy P. Effect of computerized auditory training on speech perception of adults with hearing impairment. Perspectives on Aural Rehabilitation and Its Instrumentation. 2013;20(3):91–106. [DOI]

17. Lotfi Y, Movallali G. A universal newborn hearing screening in Iran. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2007;5(5–6):8–11. [Persian]

18. Nanjundaswamy M, Prabhu P, Rajanna R, Ningegowda R, Sharma M. Computer-based auditory training programs for children with hearing impairment – a scoping review. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;22(1):88–93. [DOI]

19. Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DK, Mehl AL. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics. 1998;102(5):1161–71. [DOI]

20. Stevens C, Fanning J, Coch D, Sanders L, Neville H. Neural mechanisms of selective auditory attention are enhanced by computerized training: electrophysiological evidence from language-impaired and typically developing children. Brain Res. 2008;1205:55–69. [DOI]