Quality Improvement Design of Educational Spaces Based on the Needs of  Students with Mobility Impairments (Case study: Taha School in Isfahan)

Majidi, fatemeh

Volume 5 - MEJDS (2015) 5: 84 | Back to browse issues page

‎ 20.1001.1.23222840.1394.5.0.23.7

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Majidi F. Quality Improvement Design of Educational Spaces Based on the Needs of Students with Mobility Impairments (Case study: Taha School in Isfahan). MEJDS 2015; 5 :84-98
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-495-en.html

Quality Improvement Design of Educational Spaces Based on the Needs of Students with Mobility Impairments (Case study: Taha School in Isfahan)

Fatemeh Majidi ^*

Abstract: (13885 Views)

Abstract
Objective: In architecture of schools, it's necessary to pay attention to the desires and needs of the members and it is achieved through designing the details of the spaces based on the behavioral and motional patterns of the students. The purpose of this study is to pay attention to the necessity of designing the educational centers for students with mobility impairment and to increase the quality of such centers according to the special educational needs of these students.
Methods: In this paper, Taha School in Isfahan was studied under field analysis. This paper tries to analyze the spaces of the mentioned school via comparison with the global standards and then suggests suitable solutions to improve the quality of these schools.
Results: The results include the latest global standards for designing schools of physically impaired kids, their comparison with the current situation at the studied school and understanding the strong and weak points of that design. The most important results are exhibited as tables, charts and numbers.
Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that the mobility impaired students have educational needs such as specific space standards, suitable furniture and equipment, spaces with wider dimensions, durable materials and etc which should be included in designing of their schools. The results of this study include: suggesting small-spaces and their plans, applications, required dimensions, furniture and etc in order to design educational spaces for mobility impaired persons with intention of improving the quality of these spaces.

Keywords: Educational Buildings, Impairment, Mobility Impaired Students, Designing Standards.

Full-Text [PDF 1105 kb] (5005 Downloads)

Type of Study: Commentary | Subject: Architecture

References

1. Ferneeuw S. Guidelines for planning a barrier-free environment, a practical manual to improve physical accessibility in Afghanistan. Services; 2005,pp: 5-7.

2. Secretary General of the International Labour Professional Rehabilitation. (Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities). Mohhamadi T. (Persian translator). First edition. Science and International Relations, University of Isfahan; 1982, pp: 10-11.

3. Miles S, Miller S, Lewis I, Van der Kroft M. Schools for All: Including disabled children in education. Save Child UK. 2002;pp:52.

4. Kauffman JM, Smucker K. The legacies of placement: A brief history of placement options and issues with commentary on their evolution. Issues Educ Place Stud Emot Behav Disord. 1995;21-44. [DOI:10.4324/9780203763445-2]

5. Zandian F, Farrokhi F, Bayatbadaghi N. Buildings Standard and library equipment for the disabled. First edition. Tehran: Nashre Chapar; 2011, p: 55. [Persian]

6. British Clumbia Ministry of Education. Accessibie school facilities A Resource for Planning. First Edishin. British, Columbia; 2010,p. 12-5.

7. Miles S, Miller S, Lewis I, Van der Kroft M. Schools for All: Including disabled children in education. Save the Children UK. 2002.

8. Ghaem G. Educational buildings and the handicapped. First edition. Tehran: Building and Housing Research Center; 1992, pp:11,19,45. [Persian]

9. Building Bulletin 102: Designing for disabled children and children with special educational needs. First edition. London: Education Funding Agency; 2014, pp:25-6, 68.

10. Atkinson H, Dorris D, Miller J, Ortiz HR, Royal M. Educational Facilities: Universal Design. First edition. Texas: Tarleton State University; 2011, PP:7-10.

11. Urban Management Department of the Lebanese Company for the Development and Reconstruction of Beirut Central District (SOLIDERE). Accessibility for the Disabled A Design Manual for a Barrier Free Environment [Internet]. New York: United Nations; 2003 2004. Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/designm/index.html

12. Jafari A. Physically Handicapped Rehabilitation Center Design. [Thesis for MA. in Architecture]. [Isfahan, Iran]: Faculty of Art, Islamic Azad University Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch; 2003, PP:68.[Persian]

13. Majidi FA. Disabilities Self-esteem and Self-sufficiency Center Design. [Thesis for MA. in Architecture]. [Isfahan, Iran]: Faculty of Art, Islamic Azad University Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch; 2011, PP:45-8. [Persian]

14. Building Bulletin 77. Designing for Pupils with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities in Schools. First edition. London: Education Funding Agency;2005, pp:86-8.

15. Johnson BM. Accessible Pedestrian Systems for those with Physical Disabilities. Roshanbin F. (Persian translator). Second edition. Tehran: Building and Housing Research Center; 1992, p:19.

16. Littlefield D. Architecture, Design and Planning Handbook. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle University; 2013, p:72.

17. Sorensen RJ. Architecture for disabled people. Habib F, Fayaz R. (Persian translator). First edition. Tehran: Center for Academic Publication; 1991, pp:61.

18. Helm seresht P, Delpishe E. Health and Disability Rehabilitation. First edition. Tehran: Department of Housing and Urban Development; 1992, pp:13-6. [Persian]

19. MEXT. Barrier-free School Facility Promotion Guideline. First edition. Secretariat Department of Facilities Planning and Administration; 2004, p:68.

20. Allen C, Abend RA. Planning and Designing for Students with Disabilities. First edition. National Institute of Building Sciences; 2001, p:86.

21. Google earth V6.2.2.6614 . (July 8, 2014). Bazarcheh